By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Wall Street Journal published a photo of a birthday note Donald Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein, contradicting Trump’s assertion that it did not exist and the story was fabricated. The note, which was part of a collection celebrating Epstein’s 50th birthday, features a crude drawing of a naked woman and was signed by Trump. The president had previously denied writing the note and sued the Journal for its reporting on the matter, while Vice President J.D. Vance also questioned the story. Following the Journal’s story, sources close to Trump indicated his team attempted to stop the report’s release, but the story has still seen the light of day.
Read the original article here
Congress Reveals Epstein Birthday Note Trump Said Doesn’t Exist. This whole situation, it’s just… well, it’s a lot. It’s a cascade of things that makes you stop and think, “Okay, so what’s really happening here?” The core issue, as the title suggests, is about a birthday note. A note that Donald Trump vehemently denied existed.
The existence of the note has been confirmed. According to the reporting, the birthday note sent by Trump to Jeffrey Epstein actually exists. This is a significant development, especially considering Trump had previously called it a “fake thing.” This isn’t just about a simple denial; it’s about the veracity of a claim. It’s about, potentially, a lie. The implications are considerable, and that alone is a story.
The reaction to this is, as you might expect, strong. There’s a lot of disgust and anger, with many people expressing strong opinions about the nature of the note and the relationship between Trump and Epstein. The note itself is described as a drawing, with some characterizing it in particularly harsh terms, comparing it to something that a pedophile would draw.
It’s interesting how quickly everything unfolds. The revelation that the note is real comes after Trump took the *Wall Street Journal* to task, and the fact that it has been revealed by Congress. This really throws a wrench in the narrative.
Then, there’s the discussion around what this means for Trump’s supporters. It seems there’s a sense that, despite evidence, his supporters might not care. There’s a lot of discussion around how this fits into the broader pattern of Trump’s actions and how his supporters react to various controversies.
The discussions also bring up the concept of “lies per hour” and the frequency of Trump’s falsehoods. It points to a larger question: how many lies does it take for someone to lose credibility?
One thing is clear: This is more than just a story. This is a piece of a larger narrative. This is why people are angry. The implications are potentially far-reaching. The drawing is a piece of evidence, and it’s out there for all to see. The note, it is being said, is far worse than initially reported.
The reactions from the supporters of Trump are brought into the conversation. It’s easy to see how that’s going to go and how they’re going to spin the facts. There is the suggestion that Trump will deny it, even when presented with hard evidence.
The entire narrative has shifted. The story has moved from, “Did he send a note?” to “Here’s the note,” and that changes everything. It’s not just about a claim; it’s about the reality.
The discussion moves to how this might affect the lawsuit with Murdoch. It’s hard to see how his case is going to be helped by the fact that the note does in fact exist. This will add to the pressure surrounding the situation.
Then, there’s the question of why Trump would lie. Is it simply habit? Is it strategic? Or something more? The answers, of course, are not easy to come by, but the questions are important. It all boils down to this one note, and the implications that it has on those who are involved.
There are people who support Trump even when faced with what appears to be irrefutable evidence. It’s a question of where their line is. Where is the limit to how far they’re willing to go to defend him? The answer is something that everyone seems to be wondering.
The reaction online is pretty immediate and visceral. There is an outpouring of emotion and a strong sense of shock, but it’s not necessarily surprising. It’s all a reflection of a deeper, more complex story. It’s a story about power, about lies, and, now, about a note.