By John Q. Hosedrinker 
This publication is dedicated to delivering unbiased, factual journalism and holding power accountable, thanks to the support of its members. Initial support helped strengthen the newsroom, particularly during challenging periods. However, continued operation requires further assistance from readers, and the organization is requesting that individuals become members to help sustain its reporting efforts. The publication expresses sincere gratitude for past support and hopes for continued backing to continue its mission.
Read the original article here
The core fear, as articulated by the CNN commentator, is that Donald Trump could, at some point, move to “outlaw” the Democratic Party. This is presented as an undeniable concern, one that’s not simply based on idle speculation. It stems from a perceived pattern of behavior and statements that suggest a willingness to push the boundaries of American political norms. The worry isn’t just about political maneuvering; it’s about a potential shift toward authoritarianism, a scenario where political opposition is not tolerated but is actively suppressed.
This concern is fueled by several underlying factors. The commentator doesn’t dwell on partisan arguments but stresses the importance of reading history books, specifically those detailing the rise of fascism. The suggestion is that the current political climate mirrors historical precedents, where the suppression of political parties was a crucial step in dismantling democracy. The actions of the Bolsheviks and the Nazis, specifically the outlawing of all other parties, are held up as cautionary tales, emphasizing the potential for a seemingly gradual erosion of democratic principles.
The potential mechanisms for such an action are discussed. One way would be to defund the Democratic Party. However, the concern goes further, suggesting a possibility of labeling “left wing groups” as terrorists, which might be a precursor to criminalizing a political party. The commentator then points to the dangers of conflating certain groups with “pornographic” or “pedophilic” content, which is a way to criminalize them and their allies. The worry is that the current environment is fostering a climate where such actions become conceivable.
Adding to the concern is the composition of the Supreme Court, whose current makeup is perceived as potentially sympathetic to such a move. The commentator notes that if the Democrats are outlawed, it would only lead to the outlawed being Democrats. This reinforces the idea that the Supreme Court is not the safeguard of democratic norms that it ought to be. The commentator does not appear to have complete faith in the ability of the existing institutions to act as a check on such actions.
Several comments touch on the practical aspects of the scenario. One point is that if the government attempts a maneuver such as this, it will be met with opposition, maybe even with force. There’s a sense that such a move would be deeply divisive, with significant consequences. One could, in this hypothetical scenario, create another political party such as “the Fuck Trump Party”.
The discussion then turns to the potential economic implications. The commentator suggests that Republicans are modeling America’s future on Russia and China, specifically referring to state-capitalist economics and a political system dominated by the Party. This represents a more expansive worry about the future direction of the country and suggests that the outlawing of a political party is just one potential step toward a broader authoritarian transformation.
The potential role of law enforcement agencies in suppressing political opposition is also mentioned. The expansion of ICE’s powers, for example, could lead to the policing of party affiliation. The commentator implies that immigration is not the only reason for the budget, and the focus could shift to hunting down opponents of the ruling party.
A core point is that the fear isn’t just about hypothetical scenarios; it is about a real threat. There is an emphasis on Trump’s track record and the fact that his administration has often challenged existing norms. The general feeling is that Trump and his supporters are engaged in a political war with their opponents. Trump seems willing to take any action that would benefit him politically, regardless of its impact on democratic institutions.
The commentary concludes on a note of urgency and a call to action. The fear is not simply one of abstract political theory; it is one that needs to be addressed. The implication is that it’s a critical moment, with democratic norms at risk.