By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Cleveland Chief of Police announced that the autopsy results confirmed Delta State University student Trey Reed’s death as a suicide by hanging. The Mississippi State Medical Examiner’s findings aligned with the initial investigation and the Bolivar County Coroner’s office. All investigative materials have been turned over to the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for review. Despite the ruling, Reed’s family, represented by Jones Law Firm, will pursue an independent autopsy and investigation.
Read the original article here
Autopsy Finds Trey Reed’s Hanging Death at Delta State Was a Suicide, and the resulting reaction is a complex mix of emotions and opinions. It’s understandable that the initial reaction involves a demand for an independent investigation. The family, rightly so, wants answers and the assurance that everything was handled properly. The involvement of a legal representative, seeking both an independent autopsy and investigation, underscores the lack of trust in the initial findings.
The independent investigation is a must, especially considering the history and the current socio-political climate. The reference to past instances, like Epstein’s death, where official narratives have been met with skepticism, highlights the need for thoroughness and transparency. The comments express sincere grief and support for the family, recognizing the tragedy regardless of the cause of death. Yet, there is a sentiment that premature conclusions about the cause, particularly those leaning towards a hate crime, can be counterproductive.
Considering the subject matter, it is important to recognize that suicidal ideation and actions are often not rational. The fact that someone chooses to end their life doesn’t always follow a clear, logical path, and forcing a narrative of external factors, such as a lynching, is really dangerous to mental health and the support of vulnerable people. Refusing to accept suicide as a possibility further stigmatizes mental illness.
The question of the autopsy’s credibility is raised. Was it performed by a qualified forensic pathologist, or someone less experienced? The quality of the initial investigation is crucial. The concerns about potential corruption and bias within state agencies, especially in Mississippi, add another layer of complexity. The comments emphasize that there are good reasons to be skeptical, especially when considering the context of a Black man found dead in such circumstances.
There are valid arguments for an independent investigation, including the potential for a cover-up, which are completely understandable. The emotional response to this tragedy is a testament to how deeply people feel about racial injustice and the lack of trust in authority. It’s a natural reaction to demand thoroughness and transparency in such a sensitive situation.
However, it is also important to note that a focus on hate as the cause will cloud the mental health conversation. It is a tragic event, regardless of the actual cause, and it is not helping to disregard the experiences of those who are suicidal.
The family’s pain, the desire for answers, and the suspicion surrounding the circumstances are very understandable. The details matter and the questions being asked of the situation should be answered. The possibility of a hate crime or foul play should not be dismissed, but it is important to maintain objectivity and let the investigation proceed without prejudgment.
The conversation also touches on the sensitivity and emotional impact of such events, particularly within the Black community. The cultural implications of a Black man found hanging in the South cannot be ignored and the history of racism in the region will naturally increase concerns. The distrust of authorities and the fear of a cover-up are also valid considerations.
The questions about broken bones, bruises, and the lack of video evidence add further complexity to the situation. The fact that the family was originally told a different story about the body’s location raises red flags. The context and circumstances, including the location (a campus) with potential camera surveillance, further heighten suspicion.
It is natural and expected that the family will seek an independent investigation. The official narrative is not necessarily correct, and there may be reasons to question it. It is completely understandable that an independent investigation is a must.