By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The federal appeals court upheld the $83 million defamation verdict against Donald Trump, rejecting his appeal. The court found that Trump failed to demonstrate grounds for reconsidering the previous holding on presidential immunity and that the district court’s rulings were appropriate. The appeals court also concluded that the jury’s damages awards were fair, and the punitive damages award was appropriate due to the reprehensibility of Trump’s conduct. This ruling leaves Trump responsible for the full amount of the judgment, which has increased since the initial verdict.
Read the original article here
Appeals court upholds E. Jean Carroll’s $83 million judgment against Trump, and the news is making waves, as it should. This isn’t just any legal dispute; this is about accountability, and it’s a landmark moment. The court’s decision solidifies a judgment against a former president, and it’s a powerful statement about the law’s ability to hold even the most powerful individuals accountable.
It’s pretty remarkable that this case is allowing the undeniable truth to be said: Donald Trump has been found to have committed sexual assault. And here we are, discussing the implications of a court ruling against an adjudicated rapist. The fact that we need to have this conversation speaks volumes. The appeals process has been exhausted, and the initial verdict stands. The amount awarded to E. Jean Carroll is substantial.
Given the situation, it’s hard to imagine Trump just paying up, isn’t it? The immediate next step is almost certainly an appeal to the Supreme Court. It’s a logical move for someone who consistently fights and denies. We’re essentially watching the legal process play out, and we can’t help but wonder if this will be the end of the road. The Supreme Court is the final stop.
The cycle of appeals, denials, and legal challenges seems almost inevitable at this point. It’s become a predictable pattern. But the repeated legal challenges and the resulting media attention, only serves to bring more attention to the case. It’s a shame because the verdict is clear: Donald Trump must pay. This case shows that no one is above the law.
The fact is, E. Jean Carroll won. The judgment stands. Will she ever actually see the money? That is the question. The legal maneuvering will continue, and the public will be watching closely. One thing’s for sure: the court’s decision makes a statement. There’s also the possibility that the Supreme Court will reverse this decision.
Many of us are asking if he will ever actually pay the judgment. Maybe this is a good thing, because the fact is he has made billions since re-election. We’re at a point where the potential financial impact on Trump seems almost irrelevant.
It’s easy to imagine a scenario where the judgment is paid, but only after a lengthy legal battle. We already know that he has put up the full amount in escrow, which could mean she will be paid from the escrow account. But if the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case, then she will get the funds from the bond.
There’s also the potential for a political angle, with accusations of bias and unfair treatment. This judgment goes beyond just money; it’s about reputation, accountability, and the principles of the legal system. In the end, E. Jean Carroll will likely use the money she gets for good.