By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Texas Governor Greg Abbott addressed individuals mocking Charlie Kirk’s death, sharing a video of a student’s arrest for celebrating the news. Abbott, along with other Texas lawmakers, condemned the student’s actions and thanked Texas Tech University for their response. The student involved in the incident is no longer enrolled at the university. This comes after the tragic death of Charlie Kirk who was fatally shot at Utah Valley University.
Read the original article here
“F–k Around and Find Out”: Abbott issues warning to Texans mocking Kirk’s death. The immediate reaction, seemingly, is a mix of incredulity and a healthy dose of “I told you so.” The situation feels rife with irony, doesn’t it? Here we have a government figure, Governor Abbott, seemingly threatening action against those who express… well, opinions, about the death of Charlie Kirk.
The core of the issue appears to be the celebration of a person’s death. But is it truly surprising that the very people who have often mocked the misfortunes or attacks of others, are now upset when the tables are turned? The comments suggest a consistent theme of hypocrisy: the right’s perceived championing of free speech, except when that speech challenges their own narratives or expresses sentiments they disapprove of. This creates an obvious contradiction: you can mock others, but don’t you dare return the favor.
There’s a consistent thread of exasperation. The phrase “fuck around and find out” seems to perfectly capture the perceived situation, suggesting that Kirk, by espousing certain views and ideologies, may have ultimately faced consequences. This sentiment isn’t necessarily a celebration of the act of violence itself, but a reaction to the perceived consequences of Kirk’s actions and speech.
The comments also highlight the selective application of free speech principles. There’s a clear sense that the “rules” change depending on who’s speaking and who’s being spoken about. The hypocrisy is jarring, with the same voices that once defended mockery and even violence now crying foul when the target is one of their own. It’s hard to ignore the feeling that the right wing is now afraid the shoe is on the other foot.
The comments are filled with an intense dislike of Charlie Kirk and his political positions, coupled with an apparent belief that his rhetoric contributed to a climate of hate and division. The response to Abbott’s warning seems to be defiance.
There is a deep and simmering resentment of what’s perceived as the right’s hypocrisy. The feeling is not that it is necessarily wrong to be outraged at Kirk’s death. The anger is directed not at the violence itself, but at the perceived double standard: free speech for me, but not for thee.
The reactions show the sentiment that the First Amendment protects even unpopular or offensive speech. The government, by definition, is not supposed to police people’s opinions.
Another clear takeaway is the sentiment that the phrase “fuck around and find out” isn’t a celebration of violence, but an observation about the consequences of actions. It’s about someone experiencing the negative results of the words and actions they chose.
The situation also opens up a broader conversation about political polarization, where opposing sides seem to be speaking different languages, operating under different sets of rules, and, as the saying goes, simply don’t like each other very much. The reactions show a deep divide.
Ultimately, this entire situation is a masterclass in the complexities of free speech, political morality, and the ever-present danger of hypocrisy.