President Zelensky rejected Putin’s proposal for Ukraine to cede territory, emphasizing that a lack of consequences for Russia’s actions will only lead to further aggression. He warned that allowing Russia to retain occupied territories would create conditions for future reinvasion. The comments were made ahead of a planned meeting between Trump and Putin where a potential ceasefire plan was to be discussed. Despite rejecting the proposal, Zelensky expressed confidence in Trump’s ability to broker a just peace, while also calling for increased sanctions against Russia.

Read the original article here

We stand firm on clear Ukrainian positions. That seems to be the message coming across loud and clear, especially as discussions swirl around potential ceasefires and negotiations. President Zelensky’s warning that a ceasefire favoring Moscow would inevitably lead to a Russian reinvasion underscores the stakes. It’s easy to understand why he’s putting down a marker. Any deal that lets Russia hold onto Ukrainian territory without robust security guarantees is just asking for trouble down the road.

Consider the historical parallels. The Munich Agreement in 1938 is a stark reminder of what happens when appeasement is prioritized over principle. Giving in to Hitler’s demands for territory, in the hopes of averting further conflict, only emboldened him. It set the stage for the full-scale invasion that followed. Zelensky seems acutely aware of this historical context, and the lessons learned. He clearly recognizes that any concessions now could be a prelude to future aggression. This isn’t just about land; it’s about the future of Ukraine and the security of Europe.

And the shadow of a potential Trump-Putin meeting looms large over all of this. The involvement of any US president in seeking to bring peace into external conflict carries weight. But with the specific context of the current US president, the situation feels… different. These are not normal circumstances. It raises legitimate concerns that any proposed settlement could be heavily tilted towards Russian interests. The Ukrainian position is that there is no scenario where the current territories under Russian control are ceded as a bargaining chip.

Putin’s ambitions go far beyond what’s publicly stated. It’s clear that the Kremlin views much of Ukraine, if not all, as part of Russia’s historical sphere of influence. His vision stretches back to the Soviet era, if not further. He doesn’t seem content with just Crimea and parts of the Donbas region. The worry is that any pause in the fighting will simply give Russia time to regroup, rearm, and then launch another offensive. It’s a bit like the old adage: “Give him an inch, and he’ll take a mile.”

There’s a sense that this conflict isn’t just about territorial disputes. It’s a clash of ideologies, a struggle between democracy and authoritarianism. And that’s why Ukraine can’t afford to compromise its sovereignty. They can’t afford to accept terms that would leave them vulnerable. As Zelenskyy rightfully understands: Russia wants to be given the territories, and if they get the territory, this becomes much easier for them to restart hostilities.

Furthermore, the discussion around potential peace deals isn’t merely academic. The Ukrainian constitution prohibits the surrender of land. That makes it clear: Ukraine is constitutionally compelled to stay at war until all of its territories are reclaimed. The question, then, becomes how this war ends. Unless the West dramatically increases support, it’s hard to see a straightforward path to a lasting peace.

The role of the West is crucial here. The EU’s stance, in particular, is crystal clear: Russia is the aggressor and shouldn’t be rewarded. And that seems to be the sentiment that the West should continue and strengthen sanctions. A future peace will require firm treaties guaranteeing Ukrainian sovereignty, backed by the threat of Western intervention. Ceding land now is not a solution; it is a recipe for further conflict. The need for strong support from Europe is paramount.