By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Russian ambassador to India, Denis Alipov, has criticized the West for undermining its relationship with India through threats and sanctions related to India’s dealings with Moscow. Alipov stated that the US and EU’s actions, particularly sanction threats, reveal them as unreliable partners. He argued that these actions are perceived as illegitimate and are not fostering trust, while emphasizing that India’s energy security will guide its foreign policy decisions. Alipov further asserted that Russia has never pursued its relationship with India at the expense of others, unlike the US, which is undermining not only Russia’s interests but also India’s.
Read the original article here
Threats to India, especially when perceived as heavy-handed or inconsistent, can indeed cast a shadow on the United States’ reliability as a partner, and ironically, Russia is pointing this out. When considering the complex dance of international relations, it’s easy to see how actions perceived as hostile or unpredictable, particularly from a major global power like the US, can push other nations toward alternative alliances. The US, with its vast economic and military influence, often finds itself at the center of this intricate web.
The issue really comes into focus when we examine how the US has acted, or seemingly failed to act, during times when India felt threatened. A perceived lack of support or a perceived preference for other nations over India, can chip away at the trust that underpins any strong alliance. Historical events, like the US’s stance during the Bangladesh Liberation War, serve as a reminder of how these dynamics can unfold and influence long-term perceptions. These actions can lead to India feeling like the US may not be a dependable ally when it truly needs one.
The rise and fall of trade deals, the shifting of geopolitical stances, and the constant political tug-of-war can all contribute to this unease. When countries are at odds with the US, it causes nations with the biggest populations to come together against the US. The lack of consistency in US policy and the rhetoric that accompanies it create uncertainty. The US, when it resorts to public threats, it can appear like a bully on the world stage, particularly when the actions don’t match the words. This inconsistency, coupled with a focus on unilateral action over collaborative diplomacy, can sow seeds of doubt among potential allies.
Of course, in the global game of alliances, it’s understood that every nation prioritizes its own interests. India, like any other country, is ultimately looking out for its own well-being. This sometimes puts it at odds with the US, even when they have shared goals. India’s strategic neutrality, a cornerstone of its foreign policy, allows it to engage with a diverse range of partners.
The US doesn’t seem to understand that, and they think it’s some kind of offense. This means that in certain scenarios, India might find itself aligned with Russia or China, not out of any inherent preference, but because those alliances serve its immediate interests. It’s an interesting point to consider: is the US actually pushing India towards Russia and China through inconsistent dealings?
Furthermore, the economic implications of all this cannot be ignored. Global trade, supply chains, and financial systems are deeply interconnected. The imposition of tariffs, sanctions, and other trade restrictions can create friction and instability. These economic pressures can exacerbate existing tensions and make the US look less appealing as a partner. The potential for mass de-dollarization indicates a distrust of the US’s economic power, a very real threat for them.
When Russia criticizes the US, it’s important to view this through a lens of skepticism. Russia’s motives are not always transparent. Russia has also proven itself to be an unreliable partner, as they refused to defend Armenia. But in this case, the words ring true, despite the source. The fact that Russia is pointing out these failings should serve as a wake-up call. It’s a reminder that perceptions matter, and that the United States must consistently act in a way that reinforces its commitment to its allies, rather than eroding their trust. A reliable partner isn’t just about shared goals, it’s also about dependability, predictability, and a genuine commitment to mutual benefit.