By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The United States government has authorized the sale of 3,350 Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) missiles to Ukraine, with delivery expected within six weeks. This $850 million arms package, primarily financed by European countries, was reportedly delayed until after President Trump’s discussions with both Putin and Zelenskyy. The ERAMs, which have a range of 240 to 450 km, will also require Pentagon approval for their use. While the US has not officially announced the deliveries, other weapon systems purchased by European governments could also assist Ukraine.
Read the original article here
US approves sale of over 3,000 ERAM missiles to Ukraine, the WSJ reports, and it’s certainly a headline that’s sparking a lot of discussion. What’s particularly interesting is the context surrounding this news. It seems the Pentagon has, according to the WSJ, been quietly blocking Ukraine’s long-range missile strikes into Russia. So, on the one hand, you have a sale of advanced weaponry, and on the other, you have limitations on their potential use. It’s a bit of a head-scratcher, isn’t it?
Now, this isn’t just about the missiles themselves. There’s talk about potential restrictions, especially concerning the use of these missiles against targets within Russia. And, of course, the influence of certain political figures comes into play. Some are questioning whether these missiles will come with strings attached, such as the potential for the US to dictate where and how they’re used. It’s a valid concern, especially when you consider the complexities of international relations and the ever-shifting political landscape.
The type of missile being discussed appears to be the RIM-174 Standard ERAM, or a variant tailored for the Ukrainian theater. It’s designed as an air defense missile, intended to counter threats like cruise missiles and enemy aircraft. However, some suggest that with the right modifications or strategy, these missiles could be adapted for a wider range of targets. But if the primary intended use is for air defense, and restrictions are placed on their use against targets within Russia, some are asking what the point of the sale is.
Then there’s the financial aspect to consider. The US military equipment is often seen as expensive, with added costs for maintenance. Given this, and the perceived potential for restrictions on their use, it’s not surprising that some question whether buying these missiles is really in Ukraine’s best interest.
It seems that the Ukrainian military is already developing its own indigenous missile capabilities, and this is a key element of the discussion. Their Flamingo cruise missile is already being developed, with a range that could potentially reach far into Russia. These types of projects could provide Ukraine with the autonomy to strike where they feel is necessary.
There is also a feeling that there is a status quo of sorts, where Ukraine can fight back, but the focus is on not hurting Russia too much. This raises the question of whether the support from the US and other allies is really as strong as it appears. The fact that some European countries are financing Ukrainian efforts, while the United States might attach restrictions, is a point of contention, as it creates a picture of a less than united front.
The use of any type of missile and the context of the situation is important. Regardless of who is selling the equipment, the need is there. As the situation evolves, Ukraine will still be able to use these missiles to defend its own territory, even if restrictions apply to strikes within Russia.
Then there is the question of a long-range missile. ERAM is an air-to-ground missile, not the anti-air missile that has been previously mentioned. It’s this weapon, with its 250-mile range, that’s making many wonder about the types of targets it could be used against.
Ultimately, the sale of these missiles is happening, but the implications go far beyond the simple transfer of hardware. It touches on issues of political influence, financial considerations, and the balance of power in the ongoing conflict. It’s a complicated situation, and one that warrants close attention as it unfolds.