By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Unemployment figures have recently surged, with nearly two million Americans continuously receiving unemployment benefits, the highest since late 2021. New unemployment claims also saw an increase, slightly surpassing economists’ predictions, following a disappointing July jobs report that added only 73,000 jobs. This report spurred former President Trump to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, blaming her for the dismal hiring numbers and potential manipulation of data. Economists, however, suggest the situation could be linked to broader economic factors like slower hiring rates and the impact of global tariffs.
Read the original article here
Almost 2 million Americans are collecting unemployment in highest figures since pandemic times, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of unease as these numbers sink in. It’s a stark reminder that even with all the talk of economic recovery, many families are still struggling to make ends meet. The fact that these figures are the highest since the pandemic really underscores the continuing challenges many face in securing stable employment.
The new unemployment numbers come after last Friday’s grim July jobs report, painting a picture of an economy that, at best, is treading water. It seems like the rosy forecasts we were hearing earlier in the year are fading, and reality is starting to bite. Hearing about the high unemployment rate, especially when so many claim jobs are plentiful, makes me wonder how real the opportunities are, and if many of the openings are just “ghost jobs” that never materialize.
The blame for the recent rise in unemployment is being laid squarely on the shoulders of Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The claim is that the tariff economy and the policies that were pursued, inherited a booming economy and proceeded to drive it into the ground. Republicans and killing the economy go together like “Peanut butter and Jelly.” The narrative presents a situation where constitutional rights, healthcare access, and environmental protections are being sacrificed, while government spending and debt are on the rise.
It’s hard to ignore the correlation between the economic downturn and the political landscape. The rise in prices of everyday items like food and housing is also cited, alongside reports of plummeting earnings in areas like Las Vegas. It seems the economic realities for many Americans aren’t matching the claims of a strong economy, and the contrast is disheartening.
The fear is that these numbers are just the beginning. There’s concern that the end of certain federal programs could lead to even more job losses. It’s almost inevitable that the Trump administration, will “cancel all unemployment.” This, of course, is viewed as a tactic to make the situation appear better, rather than addressing the underlying problems.
The argument continues with the idea of the Federal layoffs that won’t start until fall. The economic policies and the current political climate seem to be creating a perfect storm. The concern is that we haven’t seen the worst of it, and that another recession, or worse, a depression, is on the horizon.
The political fallout is already predictable, with discussions of potential cuts to unemployment benefits. It’s easy to imagine Congress and individual states trying to find ways to make it harder to claim these benefits, or decreasing the amounts people receive. The focus is no longer on aiding those who need the support, and more on restricting the aid available.
The focus on unemployment numbers is seen as a distraction from the more significant issues, particularly vast wealth inequality. The comment is that even during periods of near full employment, this gap has remained far too wide, posing a threat to democracy. The worry is that the economic strategy is all about controlling the situation, not fixing it.
It’s hard not to be cynical when we see reactions that dismiss the figures or try to find someone to blame for reporting them. The fact that the focus is on finding someone to fire for making the economic picture look “bad” speaks volumes. The claim is that anti employment policies will lead to less employment. No one could’ve known that.
The economic policies pursued have been described as a series of actions that are guaranteed to have negative consequences, leading to layoffs and increased unemployment rates. It’s a situation that feels like a self-fulfilling prophecy. The response seems to be to double down on the problematic approaches, rather than shifting course. The sentiment is that somebody is about to lose their job.
The response from certain quarters is to dismiss the numbers, claim they’re a “scam,” or even suggest that the messenger should be fired. This is how we’re supposed to make things better? It’s a disturbing display of denial. It’s easy to imagine a scenario where the only solution proposed is to “fire” their way out of it.