By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine has targeted the Druzhba oil pipeline, which delivers Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia, disrupting supplies to these EU member states. The attack on the Unecha pumping station in Russia’s Bryansk region, confirmed by Ukrainian officials, prompted Hungary and Slovakia to request assistance from the European Commission. This strike marks the third attack on the pipeline in recent times, eliciting condemnation from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who opposes EU sanctions on Russian energy. Hungary and Slovakia are the only EU nations still reliant on Russian oil, and the interruption has further heightened tensions amidst the ongoing conflict.
Read the original article here
Ukraine attacks pipeline that sends Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia.
Well, this is certainly a developing situation, isn’t it? News has broken about Ukraine targeting a key pumping station on the Druzhba oil pipeline. This pipeline is a major artery for Russian oil, specifically supplying Hungary and Slovakia with their crude oil needs. This attack has effectively cut off supplies to these two EU nations, making them the latest casualties in this complex geopolitical dance.
The immediate reaction from Hungary has been, shall we say, not thrilled. Their Foreign Minister wasted no time expressing his displeasure, labeling it an attack on their country’s energy security and an attempt to drag them further into the war. This is understandable, considering Hungary relies heavily on this pipeline, getting more than half its crude oil from it.
Now, let’s be frank, Hungary’s position in all of this is…complicated. Their Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, has consistently taken a stance that’s less than supportive of Ukraine. He’s resisted joining the rest of the EU in providing significant political, economic, and military backing to Kyiv. In fact, he even took a trip to Moscow last year to visit Putin, a move that definitely raised eyebrows and drew criticism.
So, the fact that Hungary and Slovakia are the only EU members still importing Russian oil makes this attack a bit of a loaded situation. Some might argue that it’s a deserved consequence, a “push” to get them to change course and align with the rest of Europe. Let’s be clear: The proceeds from the sale of that oil are funding a war where innocent Ukrainians are being murdered.
The damage to the pumping station is described as significant, destroying the large pumping station located at the distribution point where the pipeline branches off. This distribution point is key, as it directs the oil toward various destinations, including Western Europe, Eastern Europe (specifically Hungary and Slovakia), and even the Baltic Sea oil port.
The implications for Hungary are potentially quite severe. Their existing infrastructure might be ill-equipped to handle alternative sources of oil. There’s talk of a 90-day emergency reserve, but that may not be sufficient. Another possible workaround could be the Adria oil pipeline, but its capacity is limited, and the transit fees charged by Croatia are high.
While it might seem like Hungary and Slovakia’s consumption of Russian oil is a “drop in the bucket” compared to the overall European picture, the reality is more nuanced. Cutting off these supplies would remove a significant amount of Russian oil from EU’s top importers. The impact on Russia’s fossil fuel exports isn’t insubstantial, though it’s worth acknowledging that they have other markets, like China and India, which are substantial.
Of course, the discussion often shifts to the broader context of European energy independence. The goal of moving away from Russian energy sources has been a long-term project, with contracts and infrastructure requiring years to develop. Even as some European nations have reduced their reliance, others continue to import significant amounts, particularly in the form of LNG.
The situation highlights the complicated relationships within the EU, particularly as the war continues. It’s a complex mix of political maneuvering, economic interests, and, of course, the human cost of the conflict.