By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine has gained the ability to independently launch deep strikes into Russia, as stated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. This shift moves away from the prior reliance on US-provided weapons like the ATACMS, which required Washington’s approval. Ukraine’s development of domestically produced long-range missiles, such as the Neptune and the Flamingo, has contributed to this new capability. The Flamingo, with a range of 1,800 miles, could potentially threaten key Russian military facilities.
Read the original article here
Ukraine now has its own weapons to strike deep into Russia without US approval, Zelenskyy says, and this represents a major shift in the dynamics of the conflict. The ability to independently target Russian infrastructure, including oil refineries and military installations, is a game-changer. This move allows Ukraine to significantly increase the pressure on Russia, potentially disrupting its ability to wage war by crippling its supply lines and weakening its war-making capacity.
This development is particularly significant because it bypasses the restrictions previously imposed by the US and other Western allies. The fact that Ukraine can now strike deep within Russian territory, irrespective of external approvals, underscores its growing self-reliance and determination to defend itself. The potential impact on the battlefield could be considerable, diverting resources and forcing Russia to re-evaluate its strategies. It also offers Ukraine a degree of autonomy in its offensive capabilities, which is critical for a nation fighting for its survival.
The creation of this new weapon system comes at a time when there is a growing global shift away from reliance on any single country. This trend seems to be playing out in Ukraine’s case, where the decision to manufacture its own weaponry highlights a strategic move towards greater independence and self-sufficiency. The development also suggests that Ukraine is taking a more proactive stance in the conflict, deciding to not play within the confines of the previously imposed restrictions, and instead, going on the offensive to deter further aggression.
The ability of Ukraine to cripple Russia’s oil industry is particularly important, as it directly attacks Russia’s ability to fund its war effort. Striking oil refineries and transport infrastructure could significantly impact the Russian economy. Such attacks could, in theory, force Russia to reconsider its invasion, especially as the costs of its war efforts mount. The more Russia is forced to deal with its infrastructure being targeted, the more resources they need to use at home rather than using them in Ukraine.
The move also highlights a key point: that the existing restrictions, while intended to prevent escalation, may have unintentionally hampered Ukraine’s ability to effectively defend itself. The ability to hit back hard, and take the fight to Russia, is seen as a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict. It is seen as a way to level the playing field and to inflict some of the same pain that Ukraine has been subjected to throughout the war.
While the exact nature of these new weapons is not specified, their existence has clearly shaken up the dynamics. It indicates a leap forward in Ukraine’s defense capabilities and a willingness to escalate, as needed, to protect its sovereignty. While the comments do express the hope that military targets are being prioritized, the reality is that Russia itself has blurred the lines between military and civilian targets throughout the war, leaving Ukraine with little choice but to respond in kind.
The move to independently manufacture weapons is also seen as a direct response to the instability in global politics. The concern of relying on external powers with unpredictable leadership, and the uncertainty of continued support, have both contributed to the decision to build its own systems. This strategic move is an example of what can happen when weapons come with too many restrictions. It’s a bold response, an understandable reaction to external limitations, and ultimately a proactive way to secure its future.
The production of these weapons represents a significant step forward in Ukraine’s ability to defend its sovereignty. This is a victory for Ukraine and for those who believe in its right to exist and defend itself.