By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine claims its military intelligence agency has obtained classified information on Russia’s new Project 955A Borei-class submarine, the Knyaz Pozharsky, which entered service recently. The data includes crew lists, diagrams of survivability systems, and operational instructions, potentially revealing vulnerabilities of the submarine, a key component of Russia’s nuclear triad. The HUR, Ukraine’s military intelligence agency, published documents allegedly obtained from the breach, aiming to expose technical limitations of this advanced vessel. This operation could be a setback for the Russian Navy, especially given the submarine’s strategic importance.
Read the original article here
Ukraine says it stole intel from the Russian Navy and found weak points in its newest nuclear missile submarine, and this has really set the internet buzzing. If true, it’s a pretty big deal, especially considering how reliant submarines are on stealth. The whole idea is to be invisible, so if you can pinpoint a vulnerability, you’ve potentially opened up a can of worms.
The comments I’ve seen have sparked some intriguing thoughts. I wonder if it’s a specific design flaw, perhaps a vulnerable exhaust port, or something about the submarine’s structural integrity. Or maybe, just maybe, it’s something as seemingly simple as the crew’s training. Could it be a situation like a poorly maintained machine? It certainly makes you think about the importance of stealth, that is if you are able to pinpoint a weakness in the submarine’s design.
There’s a general consensus that submarines are only as good as their stealth. Finding a chink in that armor gives you a significant tactical advantage. The comments seem to suggest this information is a significant advantage for the Ukrainians if they have discovered a weakness.
Why would Ukraine announce this publicly? It’s a fair question. The reason, the public’s perspective, could be to send a message, to sow seeds of doubt and paranoia. They could be trying to make Russia question everything about its submarines, forcing them to divert resources to address potential problems. The intel’s value lies not only in what Ukraine knows but also in what Russia *thinks* Ukraine knows. Maybe they want to make it appear that Russia should avoid making rash decisions that could create a reaction.
The discussions also bring up a really interesting aspect of military intelligence: incentives. It’s not always about keeping secrets close. Sometimes, the threat of exposure, the knowledge that someone *else* knows something, can change the game. If you have something the opponent would rather not use, like a nuclear submarine, then you try to give the opponent an incentive to avoid that, which is not being in a situation to *have* to act on it.
Of course, the whole thing could be a bluff. A carefully crafted story intended to spook the enemy. But even if it’s not entirely accurate, the fact that Ukraine is putting the information out there, claiming they found a weakness in Russia’s newest nuclear missile submarine, could be enough to do its work by creating doubt and uncertainty.
The conversations also raise questions about the state of the Russian Navy. Is it a case of poor engineering, a poorly trained crew, and a culture of corruption and cover-ups? Or are they simply exploiting existing vulnerabilities? Given the potential for corruption, there’s a chance half the parts have been sold off.
As for actual weaknesses, there are a few possibilities that have been raised. It could be an exhaust port. Or, perhaps, it’s an issue with the crew roster or mission details, anything that could potentially stop the sub from launching or bringing it back to port.
Another interesting point that came up is the use of sonar. Modern submarines aren’t always using active sonar to avoid detection. They might be operating more or less blind while listening for sonar from other ships, which means they’re susceptible to surprises.
In terms of the subs themselves, the point that was emphasized a few times is the importance of stealth. Because if their stealth is compromised, they become prime targets. It’s a chilling thought, that these vessels, designed for stealth and the ultimate deterrent, might be vulnerable.
Finally, there is the impact on Russian leadership and personnel. They have to consider everything, they have to waste time and resources, they have to address the issues. This adds to the chaos and confusion. All of this can create a climate of distrust and anxiety. Ultimately, Ukraine’s claim, whether fully true or not, serves to unsettle the enemy and keep them guessing.