By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the implementation of new UK online safety rules, major adult content websites like Pornhub and XVideos experienced a significant 47% drop in traffic, with OnlyFans also seeing a decline. Data suggests that while compliant sites saw a decrease, less regulated pornography sites experienced an increase in visits. The new rules, enforced by Ofcom, require age verification methods such as credit card checks and photo ID matching. Consequently, VPN app downloads surged, potentially enabling users to bypass these restrictions and access content from different locations.
Read the original article here
Porn site traffic plummets as UK age verification rules enforced, and let’s be honest, it’s a bit of a mess, isn’t it? Suddenly, the joy of a quick, discreet browse has turned into a bureaucratic hurdle. It’s like being asked for your ID at a candy store – you know, just to make sure you’re old enough to appreciate the finer things in life. Many are finding this age verification process more irritating than anything else, especially on sites that might not even be considered overtly “pornographic.”
Coincidentally, VPN usage in the UK has shot up during this period. This isn’t exactly a shocker. If you’re suddenly being asked to hand over personal details to access something, a VPN becomes a tempting, and frankly, obvious solution. It’s a digital shield, allowing you to bypass these new rules and, in theory, maintain a bit more privacy. The data from Pornhub, for example, shows a drop of around a million UK visits after the age verification came into effect, and it’s easy to deduce that the visits haven’t actually disappeared – they’ve just been redirected.
This leads to an interesting question: where did all those UK visitors go? Were they simply put off by the age verification? Or did they migrate to other sites, sites that might not be playing by the rules? There’s the other issue – these “sketchy” websites, the ones that aren’t bothering with age verification, are likely where a lot of the traffic is now heading. This raises a fundamental question: did the government consider this consequence when enforcing these new rules? It’s almost like a case of “morality policing” dressed up as child protection, but with some rather predictable unintended consequences.
It’s also worth noting the seemingly inconsistent approach of some major players. Pornhub pulled out of France when a similar law was introduced. They didn’t even provide the service. Yet, they remain available in the UK, despite the new rules. Is this some sort of tacit acknowledgement that the UK market is just too lucrative to ignore? Or perhaps a sign that the regulatory landscape is less punitive in the UK than in France?
Meanwhile, the porn traffic in the US is reportedly up. The real truth is that it’s not necessarily that porn consumption has increased overall, but rather that tracking it has become more difficult. This means the data may be skewed by the growing adoption of privacy tools, like VPNs. The government’s stated goal may be a “success” from a purely statistical point of view, but the reality is more complex.
It’s clear that many people are simply choosing alternative routes to their content. They’re not disappearing; they’re just moving, often to sites that are less regulated and potentially more risky. The whole exercise seems to be a bit of a game of whack-a-mole, where new regulations drive traffic towards less desirable corners of the internet.
As predicted, people are switching to more obscure sites, just as many predicted. What the government seems to have overlooked is that human nature doesn’t change. People want what they want, and they will find a way to get it. The rise of VPNs, and the surge in traffic in countries where the regulations haven’t been enforced as strongly, speaks volumes.
The cost of VPNs is a legitimate concern, with the new regulations, these services may be able to increase their prices. It’s interesting to consider that some are abstaining from the web, not for the sake of convenience, but to protect their data.
This entire situation highlights a fundamental truth: porn is a powerful driver of internet traffic. It was a key factor in the growth of the internet’s early infrastructure.
Of course, there’s a big distinction to be made here. Not all porn is created equal. Some content is problematic, especially when it involves children. The real underlying issue here is not the existence of porn itself, but rather the broader societal attitudes and the complexities of personal sexuality and expression.
It’s worth reflecting on the potential impact on mental health. The new restrictions, by inconveniencing people to access online content, may also have unintended mental health impacts.
And here’s another key point: it’s easy to circumvent the rules. What’s stopping someone from simply uploading an image of another adult for age verification? The system is ripe for exploitation, and many are questioning its effectiveness.
So, while the government may declare victory, the reality is more nuanced. The age verification rules have had a significant impact, but it hasn’t necessarily reduced overall consumption. It’s driven traffic elsewhere, pushed people to use tools like VPNs, and raised questions about the effectiveness of the regulation itself. In short, the UK’s new rules seem to have only changed the routes people take to get what they want.