By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The actions taken appear to be designed to influence the upcoming elections. According to experts, focusing on election integrity while also referencing the 2026 elections reveals a true intent of election rigging. These maneuvers, including expanded National Guard presence and potential limitations on voting, may be implemented to impact the midterm elections. The actions are justified with fabricated pretexts.
Read the original article here
Angry Trump Accidentally Blurts Out Unnerving New Plot to Rig Midterms. The air crackles with an unsettling energy when the former president is on the stage. It seems that in a moment of unscripted fury, Trump accidentally revealed what could be a terrifying new plan to manipulate the upcoming midterm elections, a plan that leans heavily into the playbook of authoritarian regimes.
The crux of the matter hinges on a seemingly innocuous phrase: “Remember, the States are merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes.” This seemingly offhand comment is a bombshell when you dissect it. The traditional structure of elections in the United States is designed with a built-in system of checks and balances, placing primary control in the hands of individual states. Trump’s statement essentially suggests that the federal government – meaning, potentially, Trump himself or his allies – could override this state-level control.
Trump’s reported strategy might involve the forceful elimination of mail-in ballots, which he has repeatedly and falsely claimed are rife with fraud. While the logistics of widespread mail-in ballot fraud are incredibly difficult and highly unlikely, the real goal seems to be something more insidious. Getting rid of them makes rigging elections easier. His alleged plan involves the federal government using its “agent” to replace state officials with their own, creating an “independent” body of vote counters. This tactic is a clear departure from the principles of democratic elections, and smacks of tactics used by dictators around the world.
The implications are deeply unsettling. If implemented, this plan could effectively wrest control of the vote-counting process from the states and centralize it under federal authority. This has the potential to allow a single entity to manipulate election results. His supporters, who often champion states’ rights, are now turning a blind eye to what is an obvious attempt to usurp state control. This is an obvious departure from core conservative principles, highlighting the extent to which political loyalty has superseded traditional values.
Adding another layer of complexity to this issue is the alleged connection to Russia and its history of election interference. The former president’s admiration for authoritarian leaders, combined with reports of Putin’s influence, raises serious concerns about the true intentions behind the new plan. Observers have noted that this strategy bears a striking resemblance to tactics used by Vladimir Putin and other autocrats to maintain their grip on power, further amplifying the alarm.
Furthermore, the timing of this revelation is suspicious. The midterm elections are fast approaching, and the Republican Party faces a difficult electoral landscape, a fact the former president’s internal pollsters will have surely shown him. This desperation will motivate his attempts to rig the elections, and Trump, apparently believing that he could simply change the rules to his favor, is in full swing to do so. This could involve the deployment of federal law enforcement or even the National Guard to polling places, especially in areas with a higher concentration of minority voters.
The underlying motives are clear: to undermine the integrity of the election process, to silence dissent, and to subvert the will of the people. What is even more concerning is the way this rhetoric is being received, and the apathy and indifference displayed by some of his followers. The focus of many seems to have shifted from the democratic process, and an acceptance of his behavior as the “norm.”
The plan’s success hinges on the assumption that it will be easy to distract the public and maintain control. However, the plan goes against the Constitution and the bedrock of the American way. The goal should be the preservation of democracy, and ensuring the voting process is secure and transparent. Now is the time for vigilance, and for active participation in the democratic process to prevent such a disturbing scenario from unfolding.