By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article explores the concerning resurgence of views questioning women’s right to vote, highlighted by a prominent figure’s endorsement of a video advocating for household voting where men often cast the ballot. This stance is connected to Christian reconstructionism, an extreme ideology that restricts women’s political participation. While direct attempts to overturn the 19th Amendment are unlikely, the article points out how conservative strategies, such as voter ID laws and restrictions on voting access, could disproportionately affect women and undermine their ability to vote. Experts warn against dismissing this as fringe, noting the potential for erosion of women’s rights through incremental legislative actions. The piece concludes by emphasizing the importance of women’s voting power in the political landscape.
Read the original article here
The Very Real Possibility That Trump Could Try To Destroy Women’s Voting Rights
It’s unsettling to think about, but the idea that women’s right to vote could be challenged again is a very real fear right now. We’ve seen rights eroded before, like with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, and it opens the door to questioning other fundamental freedoms. The right to vote, arguably, is the bedrock of all other rights, and the potential for its restriction is a serious cause for concern. Considering the historical context and the current political climate, the prospect of efforts to limit or even eliminate women’s suffrage is a grim possibility.
The focus on women’s voting rights isn’t just about women; it’s about the entire balance of power. If a significant portion of the electorate is disenfranchised, the outcome of elections can be drastically altered, and the country could be run in a way that serves a narrow segment of the population. This isn’t a theoretical exercise anymore. We see echoes of this sentiment in the words and actions of those close to the former president. It’s deeply troubling when influential figures promote the idea of household voting, where the male head of the household casts the ballot for the entire family. This kind of rhetoric is not merely fringe; it’s a direct challenge to the fundamental right of individual voting.
The situation also shows how something like abortion rights can be rolled back, despite overwhelming public support for them. It highlights the capacity of political forces to overturn established rights, and this should be considered as a cautionary tale. This precedent could certainly be applied to women’s suffrage as well. If efforts are made to manipulate the electoral process through voter ID laws or other restrictions, the impact is magnified, particularly for women, especially married women.
It also exposes the inherent danger of an administration seemingly hostile to women’s rights, especially given the prevalence of such views within the government. The potential consequences are far-reaching, and it is reasonable to ask if it’s inevitable given the direction in which things are going. The worry is not just about women, but about all voting rights. If the goal is to suppress votes, they may begin with mail-in voting and early voting. Then, they might move on to immigrants or people with criminal records. Then, the next thing you know, it’s all about men voting for their wives.
The historical precedent, the rhetoric coming from influential individuals, and the actions of those in positions of power all contribute to a very real fear. If this becomes a reality, it could spark the type of resistance that makes change happen. It’s a situation where the very fabric of our democratic principles is at stake. Those who are fighting for these freedoms will not relent. There is no doubt about that.
The economy of the USA is in a precarious situation, and attempts to strip away rights from half the country’s workforce are a catastrophic concept to even suggest. This would not stand. There is a very real potential for the economy to collapse due to such actions. It is a sad reality. It has always been the plan for the GOP. Gilead is the goal.