By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite publicly desiring a Nobel Peace Prize, Donald Trump is potentially escalating conflicts and weakening America’s global standing. He has signaled approval for Israel’s potential occupation of Gaza, ignoring potential ramifications. Furthermore, Trump appears ready to concede significant territory to Russia in Ukraine, potentially undermining the country’s sovereignty and emboldening other aggressors like China. These actions, combined with a growing alliance of adversaries, threaten to isolate the United States and destabilize the international order.
Read the original article here
Trump wants to win the Nobel Peace Prize, and the idea itself feels like a deeply ironic, almost darkly comedic proposition. It’s a stark contrast to the reality of his actions and the potential consequences they could unleash. It’s almost as if he’s chasing the ultimate participation trophy, a validation he craves to silence that persistent little voice in his head. The prize is awarded for exceptional contributions that have a significant impact on society, and the comments point out that Trump’s actions often have the opposite effect, especially when it comes to escalating conflicts.
He’s already known for, and has a history of, making things worse. The idea of him trying to wrangle a Nobel Peace Prize while simultaneously exacerbating existing conflicts feels like a disaster in the making. He might genuinely believe he deserves it, blinded by his own self-importance, but the rest of the world sees the potential for increased instability and suffering. We hear the sentiment expressed that he could give Ukraine to Russia and Gaza to Israel as his way of solving these crises. These kinds of actions, however, would not bring peace, and would make the existing conflicts worse. Instead, resolving the problems would require addressing the interests of both parties.
One of the most consistent criticisms swirling around Trump is his alleged desire to release the Epstein files. The comments call for it, indicating a belief that there’s something to be revealed that could have major repercussions. These files, if they contained information that could link Trump to illegal activity, would certainly complicate any claim for a peace prize and could be a detriment to the situations in Ukraine and Israel if he’s found to be in cahoots with the parties involved. Trump’s actions, even his words, have a tendency to inflame existing tensions. The mere suggestion of him getting involved in delicate negotiations, whether involving Russia or Israel, triggers a sense of foreboding.
It’s understandable that people would question the Nobel committee if they even considered Trump a candidate. The award is for contributions with significant impacts, and based on the feedback, Trump’s style is anything but. He often comes off as someone who thrives on chaos. His tendency to make enemies and stir up trouble suggests that instead of bringing people together, he actually drives them further apart. He doesn’t seem to grasp how the world sees him. He is not only known for his brash, often offensive behavior, but also for the black eye he gives to the United States on the global stage. The comments are clear: he comes across as an absolute “jackass” to the rest of the world.
The situation boils down to this: Trump wants the prize, but his actions seem to be actively working against the very ideals the Nobel Peace Prize represents. The very real potential for him to worsen existing conflicts, rather than resolving them, undermines any claim he might try to make. Some feel that he is making this worse by simply trying, or at the very least, the outcome will be worsened as a result. This is a crucial distinction. Awarding him a prize would not only be ironic but also actively harmful. The comments express a deep concern that giving Trump the prize would make the prize itself less valuable.