By John Q. Hosedrinker 
HuffPost reflects on two decades of delivering fearless and fact-based journalism, emphasizing its commitment to serving readers. The publication acknowledges the crucial role reader support has played in its success, particularly in maintaining its newsroom through challenges. As HuffPost looks ahead, it appeals to its audience to continue supporting its mission to ensure its longevity and continued delivery of quality journalism. This ongoing support is vital for the future of their work.
Read the original article here
“His Brain Is Mush”: Trump’s Latest Misspeak Has Critics Calling ‘Total Bulls**t’ – The president shared a story that’s not likely to be true — and his critics are calling him out over it.
Let’s just dive right in, shall we? The latest episode in the never-ending saga of Donald Trump and his pronouncements involves a tale of voting that, frankly, has raised a few eyebrows. It seems the former president, while discussing mail-in voting, recounted a personal experience at the polls. The detail? He was supposedly asked for his license plate number. Now, anyone with a modicum of experience with voting in person knows that’s not exactly a standard requirement.
The immediate reaction, it appears, was one of widespread skepticism, and a healthy dose of, well, let’s call it “disbelief.” Critics, and let’s be clear, there were many, seized on this anecdote as yet another example of Trump’s tendency to, shall we say, embellish, or even outright fabricate, details. The common sentiment seems to be that this story is, to put it bluntly, “total bulls**t.”
The core issue, as many see it, lies not just in the implausibility of the anecdote, but in its reflection of Trump’s cognitive state. There’s a prevailing concern, echoed by commentators across the spectrum, that Trump’s mental acuity is waning. His words are confused because, well, according to those same commentators, he’s an “old fuck.” The apparent inability to distinguish between a driver’s license and a license plate has fueled the flames of those concerns, painting a picture of someone whose grip on reality is, at best, tenuous.
The term “confabulation” has been thrown around, a clinical term used to describe the invention of memories to fill in gaps, which is common with dementia. The assertion is that Trump is no longer able to accurately recall events and creates narratives to cover those lapses. This is especially alarming, as the former President seems to keep being in a position to run for the most powerful office in the world. There’s a general unease about the prospect of someone in that position being prone to such memory lapses.
There’s a definite frustration being voiced, a feeling that the media is not holding Trump to the same standards as others. Some critics see this as a persistent pattern, a reluctance to call out Trump’s falsehoods with the same vigor they might use for other politicians. This perceived bias adds fuel to the fire, with many decrying the media’s perceived kid gloves approach to Trump’s gaffes.
The sentiment of people is that the media is failing to adequately call him out when he spouts obvious lies, and it’s not a new phenomenon. Many are tired of the same cycle of misstatements, criticisms, and denials, with each instance reinforcing a sense of exasperation.
There’s also a broader concern about the implications of Trump’s statements. Some see his words as a deliberate attempt to sow doubt and confusion, particularly regarding the integrity of the voting process. This is not the first time, and likely will not be the last, where these concerns have been raised, but his detractors are relentless in their belief that each instance should be called out.
The underlying theme, it seems, is a growing distrust in Trump’s ability to handle the truth. There’s a deep well of concern, a sentiment that echoes among a segment of the population, about the potential consequences of someone in such a position being unable to accurately relay information.