By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent appearance, President Trump claimed his administration had lowered drug prices by an impossible 1200-1500 percent. This statement, which was met with widespread ridicule, follows Trump’s pattern of citing unrealistic figures on various topics. This claim also occurred just days after the firing of a top government statistics official due to job growth data. The president has been previously criticized for making similar inaccurate statements regarding inflation and poll numbers.
Read the original article here
Trump Says He’s Lowered Drug Prices by ‘1500%’ After Firing Stats Boss – The president’s boast defied basic arithmetic. This is a statement that, frankly, needs to be unpacked. The sheer absurdity of the claim, “1500%,” immediately sets off alarm bells. It’s not just an exaggeration; it’s a mathematical impossibility when we’re talking about a price reduction. The comments circulating suggest this. A 100% reduction would mean something is free, right? Anything more than that… well, it’s the kind of math that makes your head spin.
It makes you wonder how he even arrived at such a number. Is it deliberate obfuscation, a misunderstanding of percentages, or something else entirely? The fact that it’s being touted, especially after what appears to be a change in personnel overseeing statistics, adds a layer of complexity. The implication seems to be that the numbers are being manipulated to support a narrative, regardless of their factual basis.
What’s most striking is the gap between this claim and the lived experiences of people needing medication. Prescription costs are a constant concern for many. Several comments point out that their actual costs have *increased*. Many people have noted that prices for everyday items have gone up. There’s a disconnect between the rosy picture being painted and the reality faced by those paying for medicine. The comments illustrate a general frustration with this disconnect.
The president’s assertions are often presented as facts without providing any context. It is a classic example of the “fake it till you make it” strategy. There’s a tendency to oversimplify complex issues, and the comments make it very clear that people are becoming more skeptical. The comments reveal how the public isn’t buying into the inflated rhetoric.
One thing that makes this situation even more concerning is the casual acceptance of such outlandish claims by his supporters. The comments suggest that a significant portion of the population is either oblivious to or willing to overlook the factual inaccuracies, which is a concern. It demonstrates a disconnect from reality, and this could become a serious issue if it continues to grow.
The lack of any accountability is shocking. There’s no immediate consequence, no correction, no retraction. The claim is made, and, seemingly, that’s that. The lack of any pushback shows the current situation is worrisome. The comments show a general frustration about this.
There is also the question of what the president’s motivation is. Is he genuinely misinformed? Is it political opportunism? Perhaps he’s trying to deflect attention from other issues. Whatever the reason, this kind of rhetoric can undermine trust in the administration and create a climate of misinformation. It’s a deliberate distortion of reality.
The irony, as some comments point out, is that these kinds of inflated claims sound great to a specific audience. The “reality TV zombies,” as they are called, are primed to believe what they hear, no matter how unrealistic it is. It’s an audience that is less concerned with facts and more concerned with emotion. This speaks volumes.
The fact that people are coming up with jokes about getting paid to take medications reveals something bigger. If drug prices are reduced by 1500%, the pharmacies would be paying people, which is a crazy thing to think about. It showcases just how unrealistic the claim is and how easy it is to see through the absurdity.
Ultimately, this situation highlights the importance of critical thinking. It’s crucial to question the information we receive, especially when it comes from a source that has a track record of exaggeration and falsehoods. To know what is true and what is not requires some basic mathematical skills. The comments show that many are capable of doing so.
It is difficult to imagine a more obvious illustration of a politician speaking out of their backside. Hopefully, more people begin to see through it, because that is the only way for things to change. Until then, we can expect more of the same.