By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former President Donald Trump sought to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, a move that raised investor concerns. Trump cited allegations of falsified mortgage documents as the basis for her dismissal, escalating his efforts to exert greater influence over the US central bank. This action follows accusations from a White House ally regarding Cook’s mortgage loan documentation. The letter was published on Truth Social, outlining Trump’s justification for firing Cook.
Read the original article here
Here’s the deal: Trump is making a lot of noise about removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, and it’s causing a stir. Now, before we dive in, it’s important to remember that this is a developing situation, and the legalities are anything but straightforward. The core of the issue is that Trump, as in the former president, is attempting to oust Cook, a sitting member of the Federal Reserve Board, immediately. He’s doing this based on an allegation of mortgage fraud.
Trump’s reasoning, as laid out in a letter, hinges on concerns about Cook’s “integrity” and “competence.” He cites her alleged involvement in a “financial matter,” hinting at misconduct in a mortgage application. But here’s where things get murky, and the headlines really don’t tell the whole story. The accusation comes amidst other financial issues, including an ongoing investigation into Trump’s own financial dealings. This makes the move seem like an act of retaliation.
The problem is, this isn’t how the system is supposed to work. The Federal Reserve is intentionally designed to be independent. It’s supposed to operate outside the direct political influence of the President. The President can remove a member of the Fed’s board “for cause,” but what constitutes “cause” isn’t clearly defined. Plus, Cook hasn’t been charged with any wrongdoing, making the immediate removal even more suspect.
What’s particularly striking is the hypocrisy at play. Trump himself has a long history of financial irregularities and accusations of fraud, so his claims about Cook’s lack of “integrity” ring hollow. This is the definition of irony, cognitive dissonance, or just plain corruption. Many are rightfully pointing out the sheer audacity of Trump, with his own checkered past, attempting to remove someone for alleged financial misconduct.
This whole situation stinks of political maneuvering, and it is, at the very least, legally dubious. It’s a move that threatens the Fed’s hard-won independence and raises serious questions about the rule of law. The immediate impact of this is that Cook has said that she will not resign. This is a challenge to his authority. It’s likely that this will end up in court, where the merits of his action will be debated and decided.
Many people see this as another instance of Trump overstepping his bounds and attempting to exert control where he shouldn’t have any. This also brings up the issue of what is “for cause.” Would a mistake on a mortgage application lead to a firing for a person like Lisa Cook? The answer seems to be yes if it’s the former president trying to score some political points. And if the target is a black woman, all the better.
What’s truly disturbing is that this pattern is becoming increasingly familiar. The former president seems to believe he can act with impunity, firing anyone who stands in his way or who he simply doesn’t like. This behavior, combined with the blatant hypocrisy of the situation, highlights a concerning disregard for established norms and democratic principles. It is, in short, a blatant disregard for any standard of decency.
The media, while reporting on this, should not use the language that he is “firing” her. He can’t. This situation is already a mess. And if you can’t even get the facts straight, then you will only make it worse. The public has every right to be skeptical. And let’s not forget the underlying issues that need to be addressed: Trump’s history, the potential for political interference in the Fed, and the need for accountability.
In the end, this is about a lot more than a single Fed governor. It’s about the very foundations of our system. The independence of the Fed is essential for a stable economy. Trump’s actions, even if they are ultimately unsuccessful, are a threat to that stability. It is, without a doubt, a constitutional crisis.