By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The appointment of an “emergency police commissioner” in Washington by Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi is viewed as an attempt to divert attention from the Epstein files, which have been a source of discomfort for the White House. Bondi’s actions come amid the backdrop of a city experiencing a 30-year low in crime rates, suggesting the appointment may be politically motivated rather than a response to genuine safety concerns. The author suggests the administration is using the issues of crime and homelessness to regain support while potentially avoiding transparency regarding the Epstein controversy, particularly given the early end of the House session to prevent a vote on releasing those files. The author argues that these actions are not aimed at benefiting the public but are instead driven by the interests of certain individuals, as exemplified by historical examples of political interference.
Read the original article here
Trump’s D.C. takeover is a desperate distraction from Epstein files, and this is the core of the matter. It seems clear that the unfolding events in Washington, D.C., are intricately tied to the looming shadow of the Epstein files. While some might argue that Trump’s actions are part of a pre-existing plan, the timing strongly suggests a deliberate attempt to divert attention. The release of the Epstein files threatens to expose potentially damaging information and could have serious repercussions for those involved.
The deliberate withholding of the Epstein files is in itself a significant distraction. The focus on the alleged “takeover” or perceived crime in cities feels orchestrated, and the public’s gaze is pulled towards manufactured outrage. This redirection of attention from the Epstein files is a classic example of the “Flood the Zone with Bullshit” strategy. It’s a calculated move to control the narrative and manage the fallout from potentially explosive revelations.
The fear of transparency is at play. The current events in Washington are less about addressing crime and more about preventing the public from knowing the truth about Epstein’s network. The lack of transparency is a critical factor. The lengths to which certain figures are willing to go to keep information hidden underscores the magnitude of the scandal.
The deployment of troops could be viewed as a preemptive measure. If Trump is in any way implicated in the Epstein files, it’s plausible that deploying the National Guard is designed to control any fallout once the files are released. It’s a sign of how much he has to lose if the files are released. Whether the troops are present in the city to quell actual unrest or to exert a show of force, it’s the kind of activity one might expect from a dictator.
The ongoing economic challenges and the public’s interest in immediate concerns, like rising costs, help the situation. The strategy is not just about the D.C. takeover itself, but also the focus on the immediate problems of rising prices, making it easier to shift the narrative away from the Epstein files. By focusing on this issue it serves to dilute the impact of the files.
The public response to these events will likely be split. Some voices may attempt to downplay the significance of the Epstein files, while others will try to keep the focus on the scandal. The MAGA movement may be swayed by the same rhetoric that often fuels their support for Trump. It would be expected that these voices will try to de-emphasize the Epstein scandal while other factions push it into oblivion.
The true nature of Trump’s intentions is difficult to ascertain. Whatever the true motivations, the timing of his actions points to a deliberate strategy. To ensure the narrative stays focused on the files, we need to keep the conversation and the demand for the release of the files front and center. It would be beneficial if every headline starts with “Epstein” so it remains in the public’s conscience.