By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a Wednesday call with European and Ukrainian leaders, President Trump stated he would not discuss territorial divisions with Vladimir Putin in their upcoming Alaska meeting. The primary goal of the meeting is to secure a ceasefire in Ukraine before any peace negotiations. Participants agreed Ukraine must be included in all negotiations regarding territorial concessions. If a ceasefire is not agreed upon, Trump intends to levy additional sanctions on Russia.
Read the original article here
Trump told Zelenskyy and allies he won’t discuss territory divisions with Putin this week, sources say. Well, that’s what they say, isn’t it? And knowing what we know, it’s almost guaranteed that the opposite is true. When someone is consistently dishonest, their pronouncements become less of a statement and more of a carefully crafted smokescreen. This isn’t just about a simple denial; it’s a strategic move, a feint designed to obscure his true intentions. It’s like expecting a magician to reveal their tricks, only to find them playing a shell game instead.
So, what does this actually mean? If he’s saying he *won’t* discuss territory divisions, it’s practically a flashing neon sign pointing directly at the topic. We’ve all become pretty adept at reading between the lines, at interpreting the language of deception. The real headline here isn’t the denial, but the underlying expectation that this very issue will be at the forefront of any discussions. It’s a given. And let’s be honest, the implications are concerning.
The backdrop to this, as it were, is even more alarming. He’s allegedly planning to meet with Putin, and as has been discussed, possibly on what is considered Russian territory: Alaska. This meeting, shrouded in secrecy, without records or even the presence of neutral observers, raises every possible red flag. The entire set-up stinks of something untoward. It’s a meeting that seems designed to avoid any kind of accountability.
And if you’re considering his past actions, and his penchant for making deals, it’s not difficult to imagine the potential scenarios being considered. Giving up territory in Ukraine is the exact deal that many fear is being worked on.
The very idea of negotiating over another nation’s territory without their presence or approval is alarming. It is, to put it mildly, highly improper. It’s not about the possibility of a Nobel Peace Prize; it’s about a fundamental disregard for sovereignty. It’s a power play that ignores the desires of the Ukrainian people and undermines any pretense of fairness or justice.
What else could be on the agenda, if not territorial concessions? The unspoken subtext here is what concerns many. The persistent rumors of compromising information, the potential for quid pro quo arrangements involving mineral rights or the release of sensitive files, these things create a cloud of suspicion. It seems clear that the main topic is something very different, perhaps involving “Kompromat” or blackmail. The entire situation seems designed to benefit Trump.
And let’s be realistic. Sanctions and other measures are unlikely to deter Putin if he’s expecting the very thing Trump is denying. The likelihood is that Trump will concede to Putin’s demands. The idea that anyone can decide the fate of Ukrainian land without Ukraine’s consent is absurd. This is not a negotiation; it’s a takeover.
The problem is that he has a track record of lying. His public statements are usually not to be trusted. The constant stream of misinformation, the exaggeration, and the deliberate misleading, have made it virtually impossible to believe him. Everything he says must be viewed with deep skepticism, because in the end, we should see his statements as mere camouflage, hiding some hidden agenda.
It is also worth remembering that Trump has no authority to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine. He has no business dictating the terms of a resolution to the conflict. It is up to Ukraine to determine its own destiny.
And this is the real tragedy of this situation. The focus shifts from peace to personal gain, from a search for justice to a hunt for profit. This should not be something that is happening. It is not something to be discussed or allowed to occur. The entire process seems more about self-interest than the security of the nation or the welfare of the Ukrainian people. In the end, that is the real story here.