By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a significant reversal, Donald Trump rescinded a 2021 executive order issued by President Biden, which aimed to promote competition across various sectors of the US economy. This decision was welcomed by the Justice Department, which is now pursuing an “America first antitrust” approach that prioritizes free markets. Biden’s original order sought to combat anti-competitive practices and corporate abuses, including those related to excessive fees and mergers, with a focus on areas like labor and healthcare. The revoked initiative had previously been popular with Americans and had been implemented to counteract patterns of corporate abuses.
Read the original article here
Trump revokes Biden order promoting competition in the US economy, and it seems to have ignited a firestorm of reaction. The initiatives that are now on hold, thanks to this executive move, were designed to shake up various sectors. The goals were pretty straightforward: make hearing aids more affordable, improve baggage handling and in-flight Wi-Fi experiences for airline passengers, give workers more freedom to switch jobs, and empower people to repair their own devices and vehicles. The general sentiment appears to be negative, with many expressing frustration and disappointment.
The core of the issue seems to revolve around the concept of competition. The order Biden put in place was explicitly aimed at fostering competition across different industries. The fear, expressed by many, is that the revocation of this order will stifle competition, potentially leading to higher prices, fewer choices, and a decline in quality for consumers. This perspective sees the move as detrimental to the overall health of the economy and the well-being of average Americans.
There’s a lot of anger, with some people calling Trump a “deep state swamp traitor” who is making things worse. This sentiment is particularly focused on the removal of protections for workers, like the changes to non-compete agreements. These agreements limit an employee’s ability to work for a competitor after leaving their job. The revocation of policies restricting these agreements is perceived as a setback for workers, potentially limiting their career options and bargaining power.
The focus extends beyond just the immediate economic impacts. Many commenters are also taking issue with Trump’s motivations, pointing out the potential for this move to benefit certain special interests or even himself. The recurring theme is that Trump’s actions are motivated by personal gain or a desire to cater to the wealthy and powerful. Accusations of corruption and a lack of regard for the average citizen are prominent.
The discussion takes a turn toward political ideology, too. Those who are against the order believe that it is bad for American consumers, and that the GOP is simply destructive to the economy. The suggestion being that Republicans are acting to weaken the economic standing of the average American. This links the policy decision to broader concerns about the direction of the country. The sentiment that is most present in the complaints is that of the government being composed of, run by, and for billionaires.
A lot of the negative comments show an overwhelming distrust of Trump’s motives. Some commenters suggest this is part of a pattern of behavior. They recall instances where previous orders were reversed, the implication being that he’s acting on behalf of special interests rather than the public good. The debate gets passionate.
There is an almost unanimous belief that this action is detrimental to the economy and the quality of life for most Americans. The criticisms are sharp, and the overall tone is one of frustration and concern about the future. The common thread is that this move is not about making things better for the people, and is actually doing quite the opposite.