By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to sources, Russia’s proposed peace plan, discussed by Putin and Trump in Alaska, involves Ukraine ceding significant territory in the east while Russia would relinquish small areas in the north. The deal also includes Kyiv withdrawing from Donetsk and Luhansk, and a freeze on the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Furthermore, the proposal demands formal recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, the lifting of some sanctions against Russia, and a guarantee that Ukraine will not join NATO. Finally, Russia seeks official status for the Russian language and the free operation of the Russian Orthodox Church within Ukraine.
Read the original article here
Reuters Outlines Putin’s Demands for Ending War Presented to Trump: The Situation Unveiled
Let’s get right to it: the buzz surrounding the reported discussions between Putin and Trump, as outlined by Reuters, doesn’t exactly scream “peace treaty.” From what’s being relayed, we’re looking at something far more akin to a surrender ultimatum. The general consensus seems to be that these aren’t new ideas; they are essentially the same demands Russia has been pushing from the start. It seems like Russia is aiming for nothing less than complete capitulation from Ukraine and a significant shift in the West’s approach to the conflict.
Basically, the reports suggest that Russia would be willing to relinquish small areas it currently occupies, but in exchange, Ukraine would have to give up substantial territory that Russia hasn’t even seized yet. The core of the issue: these terms are completely unacceptable to Ukraine and will never be signed on to. This is especially true since Ukraine knows the security implications of losing those territories and how vulnerable it would leave the rest of the country.
The whole situation really paints a picture. Trump, from the information available, seems to have been placed in a vulnerable position, listening to and, in effect, legitimizing Putin’s goals. It gives Putin a platform, a break from international isolation, and a perception that Russia is dictating the terms. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that this wasn’t a negotiation; it was Trump, as the weakest US president.
Looking at what’s potentially on the table, the demands described in the reports are pretty stark. It’s a “take it or leave it” situation, with Russia effectively calling the shots. If anything, it looks like Putin’s just flexing, trying to maintain his “strongman” image, while the war drags on.
One thing that seems to come up is the total lack of Ukrainian involvement in these discussions. It looks like a meeting in the limousine of two parties without the critical player at the table. It’s hard to see how any genuine progress can be made when the country most affected isn’t part of the conversation.
The situation becomes even more questionable when we look at the potential implications. If these alleged demands were somehow accepted, it could dramatically reshape Ukraine’s borders, potentially leading to the future invasion.
From an American perspective, the overall response seems to be a mixture of disbelief and frustration. People are struggling to understand how the US, with its resources and influence, could allow itself to be outmaneuvered like this.
The conversation also highlights the inherent difficulties in any potential peace process. It seems like it’s not about a genuine compromise but Russia demanding everything.
The whole thing really gives the impression of Russia testing the waters and looking for weakness. The general feeling is that the West needs to step up and take a much firmer stance. The suggested solutions, if the information is correct, are not really peace proposals but terms of surrender.