By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Jared Wise, an ex-FBI agent who urged rioters to “kill” law enforcement during the January 6th Capitol attack, was pardoned by President Trump. Wise, facing charges related to the riots, is now employed as a senior advisor within the Department of Justice. This appointment follows Trump’s actions, including dismissing Wise’s case and issuing pardons for numerous January 6th participants. The administration has also taken steps to dismantle the work of prior investigators, raising concerns about the handling of the attack’s repercussions.
Read the original article here
He told Jan 6 rioters to ‘kill’ cops, and then, after a presidential pardon, he landed a job at the Justice Department. This situation, frankly, feels like something ripped from a dystopian novel, yet it’s apparently reality. It’s the kind of headline that should be dominating the news cycle, sparking outrage, and demanding accountability. The very idea that someone who seemingly incited violence against law enforcement is then embraced by the institution that upholds the law is a slap in the face to anyone who believes in justice and the rule of law.
One can easily imagine the reaction if a similar scenario had unfolded under a different administration. The outrage from certain corners of the political spectrum would be deafening, with calls for investigations, resignations, and perhaps even impeachment. The 24/7 news coverage would dissect every detail, every word, every nuance of the situation. Yet, as this situation appears to unfold, the response seems muted, perhaps even non-existent, in some circles. It begs the question: Are the standards of accountability different depending on who is in power?
The “party of law and order” is often touted as being unwavering in its support for law enforcement. Yet, the optics of this situation are undeniably problematic. One has to wonder how many police officers would feel after learning that someone who may have encouraged violence against them is now working within the Justice Department. It seems to make a mockery of the “blue lives matter” slogan. It highlights a disturbing disconnect between rhetoric and reality.
It’s easy to get lost in the specifics, but the larger point is clear: actions have consequences, or at least they should. If inciting violence against law enforcement is not considered a disqualifying factor for a position within the Justice Department, what is? This sends a chilling message about the value placed on law and order, and on the safety and well-being of those who put their lives on the line to protect the public.
This situation, however, is far from an isolated incident. It’s part of a broader pattern, one where loyalty and ideological alignment seem to trump any sense of ethical conduct or professional standards. The idea that this behavior is acceptable, that it will simply be shrugged off or explained away, is deeply troubling. It suggests a dangerous normalization of corruption and a willingness to sacrifice the principles of justice on the altar of political expediency.
Some argue that the intent behind the words, or lack thereof, should be considered. But when the words involve calling for the death of law enforcement officers, it’s hard to give the speaker the benefit of the doubt. The implications of such statements cannot be easily dismissed. They can serve as a trigger and instigate harm.
Of course, there will be those who deny the facts, who dismiss the concerns, or who simply refuse to engage. But for those who care about justice, the rule of law, and the integrity of our institutions, this situation demands attention. It’s a test of our values, a challenge to our commitment to hold those in power accountable, and a reminder that the fight for a just society is a constant struggle.
The silence of those who would typically be most vocal on matters of law and order is deafening. It exposes hypocrisy and raises serious questions about their true priorities. It reveals how quickly principles can be abandoned in the name of political gain. The very idea of it is sickening to many.
It is a clear indication that the system we depend on is corrupt and unreliable. It demonstrates a dangerous erosion of the principles upon which our society is built. The need for accountability has never been more critical. The time to act is now.