By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent event promoting Western independence, former CEO of the Alberta Prosperity Project, Dennis Modry, claimed that officials in the Trump administration discussed providing Alberta with a $500 million transition loan to facilitate its independence from Canada. Modry also stated that they discussed a plan to support Alberta’s currency by exchanging Canadian dollars for U.S. dollars, and even hinted at the possibility of America recognizing Alberta as a state. These discussions took place during a meeting in Washington where Modry outlined the benefits of an independent Alberta, particularly its energy resources, to the United States. The separatist movement in Alberta, highlighted at the event, is driven by concerns over federal regulations, immigration policies, and a desire for greater alignment with American ideologies of small government and conservative values.
Read the original article here
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: Well, this is a doozy, isn’t it? The core of the issue revolves around the alleged discussions amongst Trump officials concerning a $500 million loan to support an Alberta independence movement within Canada. The whole concept is, frankly, a bit bewildering.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: The immediate reaction is a mix of disbelief and outrage. Some are saying that $500 million is a laughably small sum to even consider for something as monumental as separating a province from a country, especially when Alberta’s economy generates billions annually. It’s like offering a few cents to buy a mansion – utterly unrealistic. It also raises the question: what was the ultimate goal? To destabilize a close ally? To gain some sort of economic advantage? Or simply to stir up trouble?
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: The idea of a foreign power, especially a close ally, meddling in another country’s internal affairs is a serious breach of international etiquette, to say the least. It’s considered by many as an act of aggression. There’s a palpable sense of betrayal, as if a friend is attempting to undermine your foundation. The sentiment is understandable, especially when coupled with the historical context of similar actions by foreign entities.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: The accusations don’t just stop at a loan. This gets mixed up with claims of separatist movements. Many think that these movements are not entirely homegrown. They see external influences, possibly even echoes of Russia’s alleged meddling in other countries, aimed at sowing discord and weakening Canada from within. This suggests an even more sinister motive, a calculated effort to destabilize a neighbor for some strategic gain.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: Then there’s the practical side of things. For Alberta to secede, it’s not just a matter of money. Canada’s constitution is pretty clear; separation isn’t a unilateral decision. It would require significant national support and would probably involve complex legal and economic hurdles.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: The tone of this entire discussion is fascinating. There is a range of responses, from outright anger to sarcasm. Some see the separatists as “annoying con artists” with limited support, while others view them as dangerous traitors. There is disdain for the separatist movement, accusing them of being loud and entitled, a bit like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum. This suggests that it’s not only the Trump officials’ alleged involvement that’s controversial, but the very idea of Alberta separation.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: The comparison to the US meddling in other countries’ affairs is a potent one. There’s a sense of hypocrisy in this, especially given the US’s history of intervention in other nations’ governments. It feels like a double standard, where interference is acceptable when it benefits them, but not when directed at them.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: The reactions also reveal deep-seated skepticism towards the motivations of all parties involved. The loan offer is viewed as a blatant attempt to destabilize a friendly nation, not a genuine act of goodwill. They are convinced this is a political maneuver intended to rally support.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: There is the underlying reality that some in Alberta have expressed dissatisfaction with the federal government. Whether these sentiments are widespread or represent a vocal minority is a key question. But whatever the truth of the situation is, Canada is very clear; land stays, and they aren’t getting any help.
Trump Officials Discussed $500M Alberta (Canada) Independence Loan, Separatist Claims: Ultimately, this entire episode underscores the fragility of international relations, especially when mixed with political opportunism. It’s a story with many layers: money, ambition, national identity, and perhaps a dash of the absurd. It’s a situation that demands scrutiny and calls for a strong, unified response from Canada, ensuring that its sovereignty remains secure.