By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET) assesses that Greenland is currently a target of various influence campaigns, aiming to create discord between Greenland and Denmark. These campaigns could exploit existing disagreements or promote specific viewpoints regarding the Kingdom and the United States. PET is in close dialogue with Greenlandic authorities regarding these threats and appropriate countermeasures. Furthermore, according to DR’s sources, the Trump administration’s strategy to acquire Greenland appears to have progressed in three phases: a charm offensive, pressure on Denmark, and, most recently, infiltration of Greenlandic society.
Read the original article here
Men with connections to Trump are trying to infiltrate Greenland, according to various sources, and the situation is raising significant concerns. The core of the matter revolves around alleged influence campaigns aiming to disrupt the existing relationship between Greenland and Denmark. These campaigns, reminiscent of tactics employed by Russia, involve individuals with ties to the former Trump administration, and the ultimate goal seems to be to sow discord and potentially instigate a secession movement within Greenland. The seriousness of these allegations has prompted calls for transparency and action, with many suggesting that those involved should be publicly identified and held accountable.
The alleged infiltration is described as a coordinated effort, with reports of individuals compiling lists of Greenlandic citizens who support Donald Trump’s policies, potentially to recruit them for a secession movement aimed at fracturing ties with both Greenland and Denmark. This operation strongly echoes historical patterns of imperialistic behavior, such as the United States’ actions in Texas, where American settlers, seeking to gain control of the land, caused the government to fail.
The methods reportedly employed are reminiscent of “Little Green Men” tactics, a strategy popularized by Russia. These tactics, if true, could be aimed at creating instability and ultimately allowing for external influence and control. The situation is further complicated by the US not recognizing the International Criminal Court (ICC), which adds another layer of concern.
There’s a perception of a pattern of behavior, a playbook that has been used by the US previously and other countries. The situation is being seen as a threat to Greenland’s sovereignty and a direct challenge to the existing political order. Some believe that the actions are not limited to mere influence, suggesting the possibility of espionage and attempts to destabilize the region, reflecting a broader pattern of seeking to expand influence and control.
The response to these alleged actions has been a mix of anger and calls for action. Some people are advocating for the removal of the individuals allegedly involved. Others are even suggesting the country to put sanctions on the US to put pressure on the administration. The situation is considered a matter of extreme urgency. Concerns are also being raised about the potential for these actions to create an environment where further destabilization is possible.
Several observations show a pattern of behavior, with a clear attempt to exploit existing political tensions. The situation, which involves multiple layers of influence, is perceived as a direct threat to the country’s autonomy. There are suggestions that the goal of these actions is the takeover of Greenland.
The focus of many discussions is the implications for Greenland itself. The small population size of the country might facilitate the identification of newcomers, as well as the implications for Greenland’s sovereignty. Actions taken by Denmark, such as the revocation of an airport’s authorization for international flights, are interpreted as a reaction to the situation.
The underlying strategy is being compared to a move in a game where a country builds up an intelligence network and tries to collaborate with another country for a quicker surrender. Some see the efforts as a type of “Little Green Men” routine, reminiscent of the Russian playbook.
The narrative around this situation is intense and charged. The calls for action demonstrate the seriousness with which these accusations are being taken. There is a very strong sense that the situation has escalated to a point where immediate intervention is necessary.