By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent report from The New Yorker claims that Donald Trump and his family profited an estimated $3.4 billion during his two presidencies. The report details earnings from various sources, including cryptocurrency ventures, Trump-branded merchandise, and his Mar-a-Lago estate. The White House Press Secretary has responded, calling the claims absurd and stating that Trump has lost hundreds of millions of dollars while serving the country. The New Yorker’s analysis also includes profits from Trump’s campaign events and contributions used to fund legal fees.
Read the original article here
The Trump family has raked in an astonishing $3.4 billion over his two presidencies, new report claims. It’s a headline that certainly grabs your attention, isn’t it? The sheer scale of the number, $3.4 billion, is hard to wrap your head around. It raises a lot of questions, and it’s natural to feel a mix of disbelief and perhaps even a little outrage when you hear something like this.
The immediate reaction might be to think about the various defenses you might hear. There’s the classic “He donated his salary!” argument, which, even if true (and it’s not entirely accurate, as the full truth is that the total of Trump’s donations and salary forfeiture combined does not cover the salary for his time in office), doesn’t really negate the impact of this alleged $3.4 billion haul. It’s like saying, “Well, I gave a nickel to charity after stealing a dollar.” The scale is just fundamentally different. Then, of course, there’s the “Democrats do it too” defense, which, even if true, doesn’t make the situation any better. It’s not about what others *might* be doing, it’s about the magnitude and implications of this specific case.
One immediate thought that comes to mind is the impact on the country’s image. There’s an implied corruption, an appearance of conflicts of interest that seems to erode trust in the system. It’s the kind of thing that gives the impression that the rules don’t apply to everyone equally. And let’s be honest, in a democratic society, that kind of sentiment can be incredibly corrosive.
If this is true, and if it was gained through his role as President, it raises serious questions about the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. This clause, designed to prevent exactly this kind of situation, seems to have been completely ignored. The purpose of the Emoluments Clause is to stop anyone from making money off of their position in the White House from foreign entities.
Of course, we must consider the potential impact on accountability. With such a vast fortune, it’s worth pondering how effective any oversight, or even potential legal action, could truly be. The ability to hire the best legal teams, to fight investigations, and to potentially drag out any consequences for years, if not decades, is a reality. The sheer resources available change the landscape of justice.
Let’s also consider what else this money could have done. How many schools could have been funded? How many families helped? It’s easy to get caught up in the sheer numbers, but the human cost of this magnitude of wealth accumulation can be staggering.
The rhetoric used by some of his supporters is also very interesting. The argument that Trump is already rich and doesn’t care about money doesn’t hold water in this scenario. If you’re already rich, why take advantage of your position to make *more* money, possibly in ways that skirt the rules? It points to a certain greed or, perhaps, a belief that rules simply don’t apply.
And then, there’s the question of what all this money buys. Is it influence? Is it political power? And, what does that mean for the future? If this wealth allows for the continuation of certain policies or the protection of certain individuals, then the long-term implications are concerning, to say the least. The potential for this to set a precedent and further erode the standards of conduct for future leaders is a real threat.
The focus should be on all of the victims. People like E. Jean Carroll, who was awarded $85 million. What about those who lost money from actions taken during his administration?
This entire situation really underscores the need for a robust system of checks and balances, the need for transparency, and the importance of holding everyone, including those in the highest positions of power, accountable. If this is the case, the lack of justice and the potential for unchecked power are issues that should be addressed.