By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a Friday media meeting, President Trump expressed support for the Justice Department’s decision to release the Epstein files to the House Oversight Committee, stating he “couldn’t care less” and emphasizing the importance of protecting innocent individuals. He dismissed the files as a “Democrat hoax,” while also mentioning the inclusion of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers in the files. Trump highlighted his administration’s achievements, citing a successful seven months in office. The Wall Street Journal previously reported that Trump was mentioned in the files, though being listed does not indicate criminal activity.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump says people are in Epstein files who ‘don’t deserve to be’: ‘It’s a Democratic hoax’ – well, isn’t this a tangled web? It feels like we’re wading through a swamp of contradictions here. First, it’s important to note that a lot of people are wondering how exactly he would know who doesn’t “deserve to be” in those files. That suggests a level of familiarity that goes beyond casual observation, doesn’t it?
Then there’s the core of the matter: the assertion that this is all a “Democratic hoax.” But if it’s a hoax, why the hesitation in releasing the files? Why the constant dodging and weaving around the issue? If it’s a fabrication, wouldn’t the easiest thing be to prove it by releasing the entire, unredacted list and exposing the supposed perpetrators? It makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Because if it’s a hoax and he’s not there, why not just put it all out there and be done with it?
Let’s not forget the timing of all of this. Epstein was caught, indicted, and died while Trump was in office. If this was all a “Democratic hoax,” how did they manage to pull it off under his watch? This really puts a big hole in his story. It does. It is a major conflict.
One of the key takeaways here is the implication – or rather, the almost blatant admission – that he’s in the files. When he speaks of people who “don’t deserve to be” in the files, it feels less like a statement of principle and more like an attempt to deflect attention from his own potential involvement. It’s a classic tactic: create confusion, sow doubt, and hope that the masses will follow. It’s pretty clear what is going on here.
This also brings up the point of the victims. When we discuss the Epstein files, who are we truly talking about? There are so many levels of complexity when talking about the victims of the Epstein case.
Looking at this from the perspective of political implications is interesting. This issue has the potential to impact upcoming elections. Who knows, this could play a role in who is running for the Democrats. Will this become a major point of contention? It’s definitely something that could sway voters.
This also speaks to a pattern of behavior from the subject. This person has never cared about anyone other than themself. It is easy to see that there is a pattern to this story.
So, there’s a list, a real one, and the implications are pretty clear. There’s a lot of confusion and contradicting information. It’s all a Democratic hoax… except when it’s not. He and his supporters need a story to tell, and the more confused the story becomes, the more confused the public becomes. That’s the key to understanding the situation.
The statements of some are worth noting. When it is brought up that the subject and his allies are on the Epstein list, suddenly it’s a hoax. Everything is legit when it benefits him. When it doesn’t, it’s fake. It’s the same with economic indicators, news reports, and election outcomes. It’s very blatant.
It feels like a campaign to discredit the evidence before it is fully revealed. It is a way to spin the situation. It’s all about damage control and playing the victim. The whole situation really boils down to one central thing: the release of the Epstein files. That is what everyone wants.