By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump signed an executive order establishing special National Guard units and a civilian volunteer force, both under his direct control, to address alleged “crime emergencies.” This order allows the President to deploy these forces, bypassing state governors and potentially targeting cities like Chicago and other locations where he deems order has been lost. The establishment of this private MAGA army, alongside the federalized National Guard, raises significant concerns about the separation of powers and the potential for a presidential dictatorship. Critics argue the move is a dangerous step towards fascism, especially considering Trump’s comments about possibly desiring a dictatorship. The author urges immediate action to combat these developments, citing upcoming protests and the urgency of defending American democracy.
Read the original article here
Like dictators of the past, Trump is building his own private army, and it’s a chilling prospect. The historical parallels are undeniable. Think of the dictators of old, from Gadhafi with his gold and personal guards to the various despots who amassed power through fear and force. It’s a pattern we’ve seen repeated throughout history, a playbook that seems eerily familiar today. The core element is always the same: consolidating power by creating a force loyal only to the leader, not to the state or the people.
This drive towards a private army, often masked with patriotic rhetoric, is a clear indication of authoritarian tendencies. It is a critical step in undermining democratic institutions. The focus shifts from the rule of law to the rule of the individual, and the consequences are dire. The chilling aspect here is the seeming normalization of this behavior, the casual acceptance of actions that should be met with outrage and resistance. This is not an isolated incident, but part of a larger pattern of behavior.
One particularly alarming aspect of this situation is the way these forces are assembled. It appears that this private army is being built from various sources, including entities like ICE. This isn’t about national security; it is about control. These are the kinds of tactics employed by those who want to silence dissent and crush any opposition. It’s a tool to enforce the leader’s will, regardless of the cost to freedom or justice. This is about creating a loyalist force, willing to do whatever is asked, regardless of ethics or legality.
The rhetoric surrounding this is also telling. We see the constant refrain of “just following orders,” a defense used by those complicit in terrible acts throughout history. This reflects a lack of individual accountability and a willingness to subjugate one’s conscience to the authority of a single individual. This is where the erosion of civil liberties begins. When people are afraid to speak out, when they fear the consequences of opposing the leader, the foundation of a free society crumbles.
The potential for social unrest is another critical point. When a leader tightens the grip of control, dissent inevitably rises. People take to the streets. Protests and demonstrations become more frequent, and they are met with increased force. This creates a dangerous powder keg, a volatile mix of frustration, anger, and fear. We have already seen the impact of this kind of polarization and the willingness to turn a blind eye to increasingly authoritarian actions.
The role of the military and law enforcement is crucial here. It raises a question of whether these organizations are truly acting in the best interests of the country. How do they feel about being used to prop up an increasingly authoritarian regime? If the military and law enforcement agencies become more loyal to the leader than to the Constitution, democracy is truly in danger. It’s a slippery slope.
The funding is also worth scrutinizing. How is this “private army” being paid for? Taxpayer money, diverted through obscure channels, is a classic tactic. The implications of this are profound. It means that ordinary citizens are unknowingly funding their own oppression. It’s a blatant violation of democratic principles.
The reaction of those who support the leader is also a concern. The willingness to look the other way, to excuse increasingly egregious behavior, is a hallmark of authoritarian movements. We see this play out in the rhetoric, the denial of reality, and the willingness to embrace propaganda. It is the denial of the truth.
The ultimate fate of dictatorships is a recurring theme. They tend to be overthrown, often violently. It’s a cycle of power, oppression, and revolt. History is full of examples of leaders who thought they were invincible, only to find themselves at the mercy of those they sought to control. The current situation is a call for action. It requires citizens to stand up against oppression and radicalism. It’s important to confront these tendencies with facts, not opinions, and to challenge those who are not aligned with democratic principles. Change happens when people start engaging in conversation and take action.