By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following a meeting with Vladimir Putin aimed at brokering a ceasefire in Ukraine, former President Donald Trump claimed Putin now “respects our country.” Despite preparing to offer economic incentives for a deal, including access to resources and lifting sanctions, the meeting yielded no agreement. Trump attributed the failure to former President Joe Biden and repeatedly asserted that the invasion would not have occurred under his leadership, while also refusing to provide specifics. Trump scored the meeting a perfect “10” due to the pair’s good relationship, and he placed responsibility for future progress with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Read the original article here
Trump brags about how Putin flattered him to evade sanctions, and it’s a truly jaw-dropping spectacle. The very idea that a former president, supposedly representing the interests of the United States, would be so easily swayed by flattery is, frankly, appalling. It reveals a fundamental weakness, a vulnerability that dictators and autocrats are only too happy to exploit. It’s almost as though he *wants* to be manipulated.
The whole charade played out on Fox News, the MAGA figurehead’s go-to platform. Instead of a serious analysis of his “peace talks” with Putin – which, let’s be honest, were more like a friendly chat with a potential adversary – the interview devolved into self-aggrandizement and, predictably, Biden-blaming. The crux of the matter? Putin apparently showered him with praise, and Trump, in his infinite self-regard, ate it up. This is a man who seems to think that being told he’s “great” is a sufficient justification for failing to stand up for American interests or uphold international norms.
The key takeaway here is the blatant disregard for consequences. He openly admitted that he didn’t impose sanctions because Putin flattered him. Think about that for a moment: a foreign adversary is permitted to evade consequences for potentially hostile actions simply because he buttered up the ego of the then-President of the United States. This is not leadership; it’s a dereliction of duty. It’s weakness masquerading as strength, and the rest of the world sees it.
This isn’t a one-off event. It’s a pattern. He consistently falls for this tactic. It’s like clockwork. Flattery works every time. Whether it’s about his business acumen, his intellect, or his looks, praise is the key that unlocks his cooperation. This makes him incredibly easy to manipulate, and makes a mockery of his position of power.
The Fox News interview itself must have been a masterclass in spinning reality. Instead of taking responsibility for his actions, he likely spent his time deflecting criticism, blaming his predecessors, and generally trying to portray himself as the victim. This has become the standard playbook: any failure is immediately transformed into someone else’s fault. It’s an exercise in constant self-preservation, prioritizing ego over the well-being of the country.
The whole thing underscores a profound lack of self-awareness. Does he not realize how transparent this is? Does he not understand that Putin, and other autocrats, see this weakness as a strategic advantage? The answer, sadly, appears to be no. He doesn’t seem to grasp the significance of his actions. He views foreign policy as a personal game, where winning means getting compliments and avoiding any personal inconvenience.
The fact that he saw this as a “brag” is almost beyond belief. To boast about being flattered by an adversary, especially in the context of international relations, is not just embarrassing; it’s dangerous. It reveals a level of naiveté that is simply unacceptable in someone who once held the highest office in the land. The ramifications of this kind of behavior are serious, ranging from emboldening adversaries to undermining the country’s credibility on the world stage.
The narrative also provides an opening for further accusations, particularly when the topic shifts to his behavior. One cannot help but notice the constant deflection. He claims it is Biden’s fault. It is Obama’s fault. It is the “Deep State’s” fault. It is anyone’s fault, but not his own.
It’s a disheartening reality that, for his supporters, this is the behavior they find appealing. The man has become an easily manipulated figure, and the rest of the world recognizes that.
The core problem is that the entire episode highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of power and diplomacy. Diplomacy is not about personal relationships; it’s about protecting and advancing national interests. And, yet, he conflates the two, reducing complex geopolitical situations to personal interactions where flattery is the currency of choice. This behavior sets a poor example, and is an affront to the values the country is supposed to represent.