By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Thailand’s government has approved a US$600 million deal for the purchase of Saab JAS 39 Gripen fighter jets. This acquisition is part of a larger plan to modernize the Royal Thai Air Force and bolster national defense. The decision follows recent border clashes with Cambodia where F-16s were deployed, resulting in significant casualties. The Gripen purchase aims to enhance combat capabilities and safeguard Thailand’s sovereignty.
Read the original article here
US F-16s lose out as Thai air force seals US$600 million deal for Swedish Gripen jets. It seems Thailand has made a significant move, choosing Swedish Gripen jets over the American F-16s, and the deal is worth around $600 million. This decision is interesting, and it sparks a few thoughts. First of all, the Gripen is a well-regarded aircraft. Choosing between a Gripen and an F-16 can be a tough call; they both have their strengths.
Given Thailand already operates a fleet of Gripens, sticking with the same type seems logical. The benefits of parts commonality, and streamlined logistics, are substantial. Thailand appears to be avoiding a similar situation to India, which has a very diverse range of fighter airframes. This can result in complex supply chains and inefficiencies. For Thailand, this decision makes a lot of sense. The Gripen is a capable aircraft that should serve their needs well. The fact that Thailand already has Gripens, and is adding more, shows a clear strategic approach.
The reasons behind the decision are varied. Some speculate it’s a case of simple preference for a reliable plane. Others believe that there are other factors in play. In recent times, there’s a growing trend of countries opting out of U.S. defense programs, with European nations like Spain and Switzerland, and Australia, making decisions away from U.S. military hardware. This is being seen by some as a sign that the US cannot be trusted in long-term strategic defense partnerships.
There is a belief that the US simply cannot be trusted anymore. This might have something to do with political dynamics and policies. The impact on the defense industry and its relationship with foreign allies is a serious concern.
The impact of the decisions are varied, in that a number of countries are now also looking at alternatives.
A key aspect in Thailand’s decision could be the desire for diversification in their defense procurement. Considering Thailand’s initial interest in the F-35, but being declined by the US, the Gripen emerges as a suitable alternative. The Gripen’s modern technology makes it a good fit for a country with a limited defense budget, and it seems like Thailand has chosen the best option for them.
Thailand has a substantial F-16 fleet, making the choice even more interesting. Some see the Gripen’s newer technology. Others see the F-16 as a still relevant fighter. The Gripen is cheaper to operate and a good fit for countries like Thailand, so it makes sense to go with the best alternative. A common theme is the U.S. not being a reliable business partner anymore, which is a major factor in these decisions.
The original plan might have been for F-35s, but with the US not selling them at the time, the Gripen was the next best thing. The shift towards economic independence is another factor. A potential trade-off is in diversifying and reducing reliance on any single country for military hardware.
The number of planes ordered in this recent deal is only four, which may seem modest. Thailand is modernizing its air force with the Gripen. A long-term strategy with additional aircraft in the future is more realistic. The Gripen is, and will be, key to Thailand’s Air Force.