By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a bold move, Texas House Democrats fled the state to impede Republicans from swiftly enacting a Trump-ordered redistricting plan, potentially creating up to five new Republican seats in the US House. This risky strategy, which could result in daily fines and the threat of arrest, was employed to temporarily halt the plan and pressure their party to devise a national response. The GOP’s redistricting plan aims to manipulate the midterms through extreme gerrymandering. This includes creating districts that benefit Trump and his party. This move has led to a call for action from other blue states, as concerns about the integrity of democracy are raised.
Read the original article here
Fleeing Texas was the only way Democrats could block Trump’s plan to rig the midterms, at least temporarily. The situation is a direct result of inaction on the part of some key senators, who essentially allowed the path to be paved for egregious partisan gerrymandering and the gutting of protections against racial gerrymandering.
In essence, Texas Democrats took a drastic step, a flight from their state, to try and disrupt a voter suppression bill. The hope was to prevent Republicans from gerrymandering the districts in a way that would give them an unfair advantage in upcoming elections. It’s a high-stakes gamble, and certainly, a brave one, but perhaps a necessary one given the circumstances. The crux of the issue is the Republican’s ability to manipulate the system to their advantage.
One critical point to consider is the significant number of people who choose not to vote. This “Did not vote” bloc could have a huge impact, highlighting the importance of voter turnout. The Democrats are hoping that a high voter turnout will give them more influence in the upcoming elections.
The desperation felt is understandable. The very idea of an election being rigged is chilling. It is an attack on the core principles of democracy, and it demands a strong response. The core issue at hand is the way Republicans are manipulating the electoral system. The fact that they are gerrymandering to give themselves an advantage suggests that they are not confident in their popularity.
Some believe that this is a critical battle for the very future of the republic. The Democrats who chose to leave Texas are taking a stand. They are risking their positions, and possibly even their freedom, to make a point. There are legal considerations for these actions, and there are strong opinions on both sides.
There is a sentiment that, in a situation like this, there is no room for centrism. The time for compromise is gone when the fundamental principles of democracy are under attack. The Democrats are trying to fight the fight, and they have gone to great lengths to do so.
Others see this as more of a delaying tactic. The Democrats have tried this before, and ultimately it might only postpone the inevitable, but at least it is a sign that the Democrats are ready to stand up and fight. While a tactic like this may not permanently change things, it is a sign of defiance.
The frustration with the lack of bipartisanship is palpable. In a healthy democracy, there should be compromise. But the fact is that the country is not in a healthy state, and so, the Democrats are doing what they believe they need to do. The hope is that the resistance will ultimately be successful in protecting the fairness of elections.
The Democrats are trying to prevent the GOP from cheating. It’s a sign that there is a need for a real solution, to make sure the system is fair. To make sure that we don’t allow those who wish to cheat to be in charge of it.