Tesla has awarded Elon Musk $29 billion in shares to incentivize him to remain at the company, particularly amidst the intensifying competition for AI talent. This move comes as the company faces a court decision regarding Musk’s 2018 pay package. The board emphasized Musk’s crucial role in leading Tesla’s transformation into an AI and robotics-focused company. The carmaker says if Musk’s 2018 pay deal is reinstated, he will forfeit the latest share award to avoid a double-dip.

Read the original article here

Tesla awards boss Elon Musk $29bn in shares, and it’s hard to know where to even begin processing that. It’s an astronomical figure, and the immediate reaction is a mixture of shock and disbelief. It’s like the board collectively decided to hand over a massive chunk of the company – 96 million shares, to be exact – as a reward. The kicker? This all happened because Musk apparently *threatened* to leave if he didn’t get more stock. Really makes you wonder who is actually in charge.

Where do those shares even come from? That’s a fundamental question. Doesn’t this dilute the value of everyone else’s shares? Tesla has sold a decent number of cars, but this bonus feels almost excessive. It’s like paying him an absurd amount for every vehicle sold, which, when you think about it, is a staggering amount of money to allocate to one individual. It’s difficult not to question the logic behind it.

The situation feels even more absurd when you consider the performance and the current landscape. While some might argue that Tesla has done well, particularly in the past, there’s a strong sense that recent performance doesn’t quite justify this level of reward. It’s like they’re rewarding him for simply existing, regardless of outcomes. There is a sense of disbelief that this is happening. You have to ask yourself, has he really earned it?

And it’s hard not to recall his past pronouncements. Remember the statement about solving world poverty? The purchase of Twitter adds fuel to the fire, feeding into the narrative. Is Tesla stock just a “meme stock” propped up by its charismatic CEO? And this whole thing raises questions about the very existence of billionaires.

The board seems to understand the reliance on the “meme” aspect of the stock. They know that if Musk were to leave, the stock price would plummet. He’s the lynchpin, and his departure could wipe out a huge portion of the company’s value overnight. This reinforces the argument that billionaires are not sustainable.

Musk could have something on the board. This whole situation raises questions about accountability and whether the rules apply equally to everyone. If a CEO in a smaller company behaved in a similar manner, consequences would be swift and severe. But here, in the world of Tesla, it seems different.

The whole situation is baffling. The awarding of such a huge amount of stock seems to incentivize behavior that may actually harm the company. It’s almost as if the board is saying, “Here, take more money for what seems like a downward spiral.” How can this be good for the shareholders?

It’s difficult to ignore the declining sales figures, especially in certain regions. The board seems to reward Musk for these issues. There is a feeling of a self-serving cycle where those in charge are only looking out for themselves. You have to ask yourself, what will it take for him to not be rewarded? It all seems unsustainable and deeply unjust.

The very verb “awards” implies some positive action, and yet the situation appears to be going in the other direction. It’s a precarious dance, and many feel that the stock’s value is detached from reality. It is like Monopoly money. A huge amount of this valuation is based on the personality of Elon Musk. His departure would cause chaos and destroy the value.

Tesla seems to be falling behind in its strategy. This is largely due to its reliance on sensors. Why isn’t the board doing something more? Is it because they’re afraid of rocking the boat? Or do they genuinely believe in the long-term vision?

It’s hard to shake the feeling that this payout is excessive. The amount of money could solve so many problems. The corporate governance is awful. And this is all for what? What is the end game here?