By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to growing concerns about the effects of social media, South Korea has passed a law banning mobile phones and other digital devices in classrooms, taking effect in March of the following year. This measure formalizes existing restrictions and aims to address the high rates of social media usage among South Korean youth, particularly as the country boasts some of the highest digital connectivity rates globally. The legislation gained bipartisan support and reflects similar restrictions implemented in countries like Australia and the Netherlands, where regulations limiting social media access for young people are also being enacted. While exceptions will be made for students with disabilities or educational needs, some youth advocacy groups have raised concerns about potential human rights violations.
Read the original article here
South Korea bans mobile phones in classrooms nationwide amid concerns about social media’s impact on kids. This news feels like a pretty significant shift, and it’s got me thinking about the whole mobile phone in school situation. It’s interesting to see a whole country take this step, and it sparks a lot of conversation about what’s best for kids and education.
The core of the concern seems to be social media. It’s been painted as more of a detriment than a benefit for young people. The idea is that it’s a major distraction, potentially “brain-rotting,” and a breeding ground for negative influences. The fear is that algorithms are subtly shaping kids’ lives, and that’s a powerful force to contend with at a young and impressionable age. The sentiment expressed echoes the feeling that schools should be places for learning, and these phones, with their endless streams of content, just get in the way. This isn’t a new idea, either. Many schools have had similar policies in place for years, and it seems like a growing number of places are looking at this issue.
Some of the pushback often revolves around safety concerns, specifically the worry about contacting kids in case of emergencies. The thought that if something happens, parents would want to immediately reach their children. However, the argument here is that schools have always handled emergencies, and the people on site are usually best equipped to deal with them. Some also feel there’s a benefit in allowing bullying victims the ability to record any abuse. Others are less sympathetic to the argument that a phone is a necessity. They suggest alternatives like watches, which allow for calling and tracking without the distractions of the internet.
Beyond the distraction factor, a significant point of focus is the negative influence social media can have. There’s a fear of kids being radicalized, exposed to extreme views, and potentially harmed by online bullying. The very nature of social media, as “shit, lies, and propaganda media” is highlighted as something that can be damaging for young minds. It’s about the algorithms and the curated feeds that shape their perception of the world. There are many who feel that social media is a bad influence.
There’s a lot of talk about a digital literacy. It’s not as simple as just banning phones, but also about teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely and responsibly. It’s about finding a balance between using technology and protecting them from its potential harms. The shift from early, often unmonitored internet experiences to the current landscape of algorithms and targeted advertising adds another layer of complexity to the issue.
The discussion also points to the larger context of the education system. Some of the comments express a general concern about schools, viewing them as “overglorified underpaid babysitters.” The focus seems to be on a need to re-evaluate the purpose of public education. It also comes down to an observation of an erosion of respect for teachers. They have to deal with increasingly problematic behaviors from students. Parents are seemingly less willing to discipline their children, which ends up impacting the teacher’s ability to maintain order in the classroom.
There’s a lot of anecdotal evidence pointing to similar practices in other places. Schools and communities have been working with this in the past. A lot of private schools already have these types of systems in place, with the attitude of preserving a serious focus on education. A recurring theme seems to be that if students don’t behave in the classroom, then the teacher has no way to truly teach in the classroom, which makes learning challenging.
The situation reveals a generational perspective as well. Twenty years ago, the same rules existed, and many still hold to the same practices. It’s a constant struggle to find a balance between using technology and protecting kids from its potential harms. While the idea of banning social media might seem simple, the reality is much more complex. In a world where children have access to smartphones, and the internet, it’s a tricky situation.