Following the Trump administration’s termination of the climate.gov website, a team of climate communication experts is working to resurrect its content through a new organization, climate.us. This new platform will not only offer accessible interpretations of climate science but may also provide climate-related services, such as aiding local governments. Led by former climate.gov managing editor Rebecca Lindsey, the team, composed of volunteers, is leveraging outside support and developing a crowdsourced fundraising drive. The goal is to provide the public with essential climate literacy, independent of government agencies, and continue the vital work that was previously accessible.

Read the original article here

Scientists breathe new life into climate website after shutdown under Trump, a story that feels almost cinematic in its David versus Goliath narrative. The original shutdown, orchestrated during the Trump administration, involved the complete dismantling of a valuable resource. The team was let go, the site was hidden, and the work, it seemed, was intended to be forgotten. Now, a dedicated group of individuals, fueled by passion and a commitment to truth, are piecing it back together. This effort isn’t about marching in the streets; it’s a testament to the quiet power of persistence, using personal sacrifice and dedication to restore something crucial to public access.

What’s particularly striking is the almost clandestine nature of the revival. They’ve resurrected the website, found a new home on a different server, and are now operating without pay, solely driven by a sense of mission. The domain, climate.us, is now once again accessible, a beacon of information in the face of what felt like deliberate suppression. This act of digital resurrection is important considering the fact that a wealth of information compiled over decades was essentially erased. The studies, the data, the research, all silenced when funding was pulled, and the entire operation shut down. This wasn’t just a matter of academic curiosity; it was about providing essential data on one of the most pressing issues of our time.

The motivation behind the original shutdown is crucial to understanding the magnitude of the effort. The comments strongly suggest that the decisions were driven by economic interests, allowing wealthy donors to continue polluting the environment for greater profit. The irony, as pointed out, is that the consequences of climate change are felt most acutely by those who may have supported the actions that led to the site’s demise. FEMA’s weakening, another consequence of the prior administration’s policies, highlights the lack of support for those most vulnerable to the effects of climate change.

This entire situation illustrates the kind of “insanity” brought about by political decisions that prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. The shutdown of the website was not an isolated incident; it was part of a larger pattern of actions that seemed to actively undermine climate science and the fight against environmental damage. The fact that someone is stepping in to repair what was broken reveals the importance of the underlying cause. It reinforces the idea that fighting climate change transcends politics; it’s about safeguarding the future.

In the face of such adversity, this resurgence of the climate website is inspiring. It showcases the significance of grassroots efforts and the dedication of individuals willing to make personal sacrifices for the greater good. The restoration efforts are entirely driven by a desire to offer valuable information to the public and continue research on climate change. The fact that the website is now operational again, thanks to the tenacity of those involved, signals hope.

The links to news articles about Trump’s reactions highlight the continuing political context that surrounds this issue. These reports provide a contrast between the actions that stifled climate science and the efforts of the team now bringing the website back to life. The willingness of people to donate to the cause, as shown by the use of platforms like Donorbox, highlights public support.

The comments further support the idea that this act of website restoration is important. The initiative gives a sense of optimism and the public’s growing desire to tackle climate change issues. The team’s dedication and the public’s support demonstrate a clear commitment to combating climate change. The fact that the information is now readily available for anyone, regardless of political affiliation, makes the website a valuable resource, offering data to empower informed decision-making.