By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russia’s spring-summer offensive of 2025 concluded without achieving significant territorial gains, with Russian forces failing to capture any major Ukrainian cities. During the offensive, Ukrainian forces inflicted heavy losses on the invading army, resulting in nearly 210,000 Russian casualties and the destruction of thousands of military equipment units. The General Staff dismissed Russian claims of territorial control and successful strikes as attempts to mask setbacks and misrepresent the situation, as Russia’s overall losses since the start of the year exceed 291,000 killed and wounded.
Read the original article here
Russia’s 2025 Summer Offensive Ends in Heavy Losses, No Victories, Ukraine Says
The narrative coming out of Ukraine paints a stark picture: Russia’s 2025 summer offensive, the latest attempt to make significant gains in the ongoing war, has ended in failure. Ukraine’s reports indicate that Moscow’s aspirations for a summer breakthrough were dashed, resulting in massive casualties and minimal territorial advances.
The claims, though, should be assessed with a balanced perspective. It’s important to remember that in any conflict, both sides tend to exaggerate their victories and downplay their losses. However, the Ukrainian assertion points to a critical truth: the offensive’s high cost, with claims of hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers lost, and a lack of any major strategic objectives achieved. Despite the claims of gains Russia is still not doing as great as anticipated.
A key aspect of understanding this situation is recognizing the nature of modern warfare. The movement of tanks are now just artillery pieces, meaning more movement is done on foot. This shift, coupled with the terrain, means that progress is slow. This war has become an attritional conflict, a slow, grinding war where the focus shifts from rapid territorial gains to wearing down the enemy’s resources and will to fight. This type of warfare is slow, and the Russians will never be allowed to forget the war, and neither will Ukraine.
The strategy of attrition emphasizes the importance of resource management and the ability to sustain losses. Russia, with its larger population and industrial capacity, appears to be betting on its ability to outlast Ukraine in this regard. The West is providing Ukraine with aid, but not enough to offset the Russian advantage in resources. The sheer volume of manpower and supplies that Russia can commit to the fight is a significant factor, even if Western technology offers some advantages.
The long-term goals also differ greatly. Ukraine is fighting to regain its 1991 borders, which puts the emphasis on recovering lost territory as a key performance indicator. Russia’s objectives, which are less clearly defined, can be achieved without necessarily controlling a large amount of additional territory, as long as they can undermine Ukraine’s ability to function as an independent state.
However, it’s also important to be clear-eyed about the realities of the situation. The high casualty figures on both sides are a tragic reality of this war, and in the end it doesn’t really matter who is correct or who is lying, the amount of people that have to die is staggering. The fact that Russian losses may be high, yet they still continue their offensive, suggests the regime is willing to accept a high price in human lives to achieve its goals.
Furthermore, it is true that Russia has been gaining ground, albeit slowly. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has reported Russian territorial gains over the past year. While the Ukrainian account highlights the lack of significant victories, Russia’s advances, though perhaps marginal in some people’s eyes, should not be dismissed entirely.
The idea of a ‘summer offensive’ also has implications. The summer months in the Ukrainian theater of operations typically bring improved weather conditions that make the terrain more suitable for large-scale military operations. The ability to amass troops and equipment and launch more sustained attacks is usually easier.
In an attritional war, the psychological impact of the conflict is also essential. Both sides strive to shape the narrative, inflating their successes and downplaying their failures. The war is a slow burn, with the potential for it to stretch on for years.
The overall assessment remains complex. Russia may be advancing, but the cost is high. The West’s commitment is insufficient to meet Ukraine’s needs. The true measure of the conflict will not be known for years. And Russia may be willing to sustain high casualties to achieve its objectives, the long-term sustainability of its approach is uncertain.
Looking ahead, the long-term viability of Russia’s position is open to debate. The Russian economy may face challenges as the war continues, and the impact of Western sanctions could become more significant over time. The decline in population and the difficulties in replacing losses with more soldiers could add to the stresses that Russia is facing.