In a move further restricting online freedoms, Russian President Vladimir Putin has enacted a law fining individuals for intentionally seeking or accessing “extremist” content online, including through VPNs and search engines. Penalties range from 3,000 to 5,000 rubles for individuals, with steeper fines for those advertising access to banned resources. The definition of “extremism” in Russia is broad and has been used to suppress dissenting voices and information challenging the Kremlin’s narrative. Additionally, the law introduces fines for the illegal transfer of subscriber data. This law arrives amidst a broader crackdown on internet freedom in Russia, marked by increased censorship and the blocking of hundreds of thousands of websites in 2024.
Read the original article here
Russia to fine people for ‘extremist’ search queries under new law. It sounds like a scene ripped straight from a dystopian novel, doesn’t it? The idea that simply searching for something deemed “extremist” could land you in trouble. Honestly, it’s a bit shocking to hear that Russia is implementing a law that allows for fining people for their online search behavior, effectively expanding the government’s control over information consumption. It feels like the Kremlin is projecting weakness, but more than that, it demonstrates an attempt to further solidify control over its citizens’ thoughts and expression.
The definition of “extremism” in Russia is, as we understand, notoriously vague and broad. It’s not like they’re sticking to the internationally accepted understanding. They’re using it as a political weapon, which means anything that goes against the Kremlin’s narrative can be targeted. It could be anything from the official version of history to criticism of government policies. It’s a clever and frightening way to ensure that the truth stays out of reach for its citizens.
Honestly, this makes the internet a whole lot more different. It feels like a direct assault on free speech. Imagine if someone just searched for information about the war in Ukraine or criticisms of Putin – could that be enough to be considered an offense? This is the kind of thing that makes you immediately think about how the world will look, not just today, but tomorrow. It feels like the internet is going to look a lot different, and potentially a lot darker.
It’s almost humorous, and by humorous I mean terrifying, the kinds of things this could potentially apply to. It wouldn’t surprise me if it even included searching for information that contradicts official state narratives. “Murderous war criminal Putin”? “Yandex, how do I leave Russia?” These are questions that could lead to some nasty consequences. The thought of having to pay a fine, just for typing in a search query, is a chilling prospect.
It’s easy to see how this could become a tool to silence dissent. They can start with extremist searches, and then…well, who knows where it might end? It makes you wonder if this could inspire the governments of the world to follow suit. This is what the future holds for the rest of us as well, even if not in such an extreme form… initially.
The underlying motivation seems pretty clear. It’s about controlling information, stopping potential protests, and getting money. A simple Google search can be monitored for anti-Russian sentiments, even pro-Ukraine queries, and the result is a fine. This kind of government surveillance is an infringement of human rights. It creates a climate of fear, where people are afraid to express their thoughts, even in the privacy of their own search history.
And the irony is not lost. Russia is edging towards this, and so are other countries. This is what governments of the world are edging towards with all the online ID requirements. The UK and EU are not far off.
This law has a direct impact on freedom of speech. They can’t have dissent, and they certainly don’t want the truth, especially about their actions, getting out to the public. It’s all about slowly boiling a frog. Any opinion that could potentially threaten the Russian status quo is considered extremist.
It really makes you wonder how desperate the government is getting. Maybe their economy is in a bad place and they are trying to increase revenue or silence opposition. This will not fix things but makes a sad situation worse.
And here’s a thought – could this have unintended consequences? Might people start using VPNs to mask their searches? Could this encourage them to use more indirect language? It is not a law to be used directly, noone will scan all the searches. It’s a law which will be retroactively applied to any person whom the government wants to get rid of. It could, of course, do the opposite, driving users to different search engines or even changing their online behaviour altogether. It could lead to people being more cautious and self-censoring their thoughts online.
And of course, as some have noted, the details are important. You need to understand how this law is actually implemented.
It’s a grim picture, but it’s also a clear warning. This kind of overreach is a threat to everyone who values freedom of thought and expression. This serves as a sign of the times, and a reminder that we need to remain vigilant.
