By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Russia has stated it will only accept collective security guarantees for Ukraine if they are negotiated with its participation and on an equal basis with countries like China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. This stance rejects the idea of Western allies developing a plan to protect Ukraine without Moscow’s involvement, as this is viewed as a “road to nowhere”. Lavrov’s comments also reiterated a previous demand for a unanimous clause requiring Russian approval for any security guarantees, hindering progress towards a potential peace deal. Furthermore, Lavrov’s remarks and criticism of European officials indicate the Kremlin’s continued unwillingness to negotiate in good faith.
Read the original article here
Russia wants… Russia to have a veto over Western security guarantees for Ukraine. Let’s just dive right into this because, honestly, the sheer audacity is breathtaking.
Essentially, Russia is demanding a say – a veto, in fact – over how the West guarantees Ukraine’s security. Think about that for a second. It’s like the playground bully, after shoving a kid into the mud, then dictating how the other kids can help him clean up. It’s a demand that’s frankly, ridiculous. The whole premise is built on a foundation of blatant aggression and disregard for international law.
This isn’t just about a simple power play; it’s about control. Russia wants to control Ukraine’s future, its foreign policy, its domestic affairs, and, apparently, even its Eurovision entry. They want to essentially dictate the terms of Ukraine’s existence, including who gets to defend them and how.
It’s not hard to see why Ukraine is vehemently rejecting this. Accepting such a condition would render them defenseless, a sitting duck. And, understandably, the West, though cautious, is pushing back hard.
What’s truly revealing about this demand is the underlying intention. Russia isn’t interested in genuine security; they’re interested in hamstringing Ukraine, preventing it from fully integrating with the West, and maintaining its sphere of influence by any means necessary. It’s a stalling tactic. They will keep making demands that will never be met.
Here’s the rub: Russia has invaded and caused all this devastation. Now, they want the ability to dictate the terms of the peace and defense. It’s like they’re saying, “We’ll let you protect Ukraine, but only if we can decide when, how, and even *if* you can do it.” This isn’t a negotiation; it’s an attempt to legitimize aggression and to create a situation where any future attack is a possibility. They only want the chance to do it again.
The implications are staggering. If Russia gets its way, it would undermine all the efforts to support Ukraine and its sovereignty. It would reward their bad behavior and create a dangerous precedent for other aggressors around the world.
Think about it – how can you provide meaningful security guarantees if the aggressor gets to overrule them? It’s a contradiction in terms. It’s like saying, “We will defend you, unless we feel like attacking you again.” The whole thing is absurd.
Some might wonder why the West even entertains these demands, but the complexity of this situation is that Russia has nukes. Despite this reality, the West should not reward aggressors.
The world needs to see through this charade. Russia wants to control Ukraine. Russia is weak, their military is weak, and their leaders are criminals. The West can’t afford to appease these kind of aggressors. It’s time to ramp up the pressure and call out their bluff. Let’s hope the world has a wake up call and we have the courage to say, “No, you don’t get a veto.”