By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Moscow views NATO’s eastward expansion as a primary catalyst for its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov voiced Russia’s opposition to European peacekeeping troops in Ukraine. This position contradicts earlier claims that Vladimir Putin would accept such a force, particularly assertions made by former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Read the original article here
Putin rejects European peacekeepers in Ukraine, contradicting Trump. This is the core of the matter, and it paints a clear picture of the current geopolitical landscape. It’s not surprising, really, when you consider the underlying motivations at play. Putin’s goals appear to extend far beyond the current conflict; many suspect he’s aiming for a restoration of a larger Russian sphere of influence, perhaps even echoing the old Soviet Union. Peacekeepers, particularly European ones, would simply get in the way of those ambitions. They would be a direct hindrance to his long-term objectives.
Putin’s strategic thinking seems to be rooted in a desire to control Ukraine entirely, or at least secure a significant portion of its territory. Peacekeepers are a complication. They represent a form of oversight, a potential obstacle to further aggression, and a barrier to the complete subjugation of the country. He is likely playing for time, hoping to wear down the West and ultimately achieve his desired outcome. He seems to want an outcome more beneficial for himself.
Donald Trump’s comments on the situation, however, present a different narrative. He stated that Putin was ready to accept European peacekeepers. This directly conflicts with the reality of Putin’s actions and stated preferences. It makes you wonder if this could have been a misunderstanding. Was it Trump who got things backward, or perhaps the reporter?
Trump seems to be operating in his own world, guided by his own motivations. It is hard to gauge his actions. His diplomacy often appears to be superficial, prioritizing appearances and personal gains over the complexities of international relations. He could be easily manipulated by someone like Putin, who has a history of using deceptive tactics to achieve his aims.
The idea of European peacekeepers in Ukraine is not only something Putin rejects, but something many European nations are also hesitant to embrace. The stakes are incredibly high, with the potential for escalation into a wider conflict. It looks as though Europe will not dedicate enough troops for this mission.
It’s important to remember that Putin is the one who initiated the invasion of Ukraine, and he is calling the shots, dictating the terms of engagement. Why would he welcome peacekeepers, particularly from Europe, when they would undermine his plans? The inclusion of peacekeepers would prevent him from moving forward with his agenda, which appears to be more about imperialistic expansion than peaceful resolution.
This difference in perspective highlights the contrasting approaches to the conflict. Putin is a leader who appears to prioritize power and territorial gains, while Trump seems to be more concerned with projecting a certain image and negotiating from a position of weakness. It’s a dangerous combination that could further complicate the situation.
Putin will never willingly come to a peace agreement that doesn’t serve his interests. He might feign openness to such ideas, but in the end, he’ll always try to gain the advantage. He understands and knows what he wants to do.
The current situation is a stalemate. No clear path to peace is visible. Sending European peacekeepers is not on the table because Putin is refusing, and the EU doesn’t seem to want to send the needed troops. The only realistic approach is for American forces to take on this role in the name of neutrality.