By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Senior Kremlin official Dmitry Medvedev warned Austria of retaliatory measures if it pursues NATO membership, accusing Vienna of abandoning its neutrality. Medvedev threatened to reconsider the location of international organizations currently hosted in Austria, citing concerns that NATO accession would undermine Austria’s global standing. He argued that any move toward NATO membership could violate international law and emphasized that Austria should not expect exceptions from Russia, referencing the actions taken against Sweden and Finland after they joined NATO. Medvedev’s statements come amidst Austria’s deepening military cooperation with the EU and NATO, despite public resistance and legal questions surrounding its non-aligned status.
Read the original article here
Putin ally threatens retaliatory measures if Austria joins NATO, and the response is almost universally a shrug, a laugh, or outright defiance. It seems the prospect of Austria joining the alliance, and the subsequent threats from Russia, are being met with a healthy dose of skepticism and a clear understanding of who’s really pulling the strings in this narrative. There’s a prevailing sense that these threats are just the same old tune, the same bluster we’ve heard before, and not necessarily something to lose sleep over.
The general feeling is that Russia’s bark is worse than its bite, a common sentiment echoed across the online commentary. Many point out the history of similar threats, particularly regarding Finland and Sweden, which joined NATO and, surprisingly, were not subjected to nuclear annihilation. The notion that Russia is a bully who only has power if it’s given any is also a recurring theme. The comments highlight how Russia’s actions, including its invasion of Ukraine, have inadvertently pushed countries like Austria closer to the embrace of NATO.
The supposed “ally” making these threats appears to be Dmitry Medvedev, often described as a mouthpiece or a puppet. His role, many suspect, is to say the most outrageous things, creating a “good cop/bad cop” routine with Putin. The focus is on how predictably Medvedev spews threats, almost on a weekly basis, regardless of the specific context. The implication is that his words don’t carry much weight, and his threats are largely empty.
The absurdity of the situation is not lost on observers. Many commenters struggle to take the threats seriously. They recognize the hypocrisy of a country that violates international law lecturing others on the same. There is also a pointed question about what Russia could realistically *do* to Austria, given its geographic location surrounded by NATO and EU members.
The response highlights the Austrian people should be free to make their own decisions free of any foreign pressure. The overall sentiment seems to lean toward Austria joining NATO, perhaps not out of fear, but out of a shared sense of European identity and a desire to stand against Russian aggression. There’s also the practical reality that Austria is effectively protected by its neighbors regardless of its formal membership status.
Many find it hard to believe that Austria isn’t already a member. The fact that Austria maintains its neutrality is often seen as an anachronism, a relic of a bygone era. The discussions shows a clear shift towards a more unified Europe, where neutrality is perceived as less relevant.
The idea of Russia dictating Austrian foreign policy is considered laughable. There’s a sense that Russia’s attempts at intimidation are not only ineffective but also counterproductive, potentially pushing Austria further away. The comments about Austria’s geographical position and existing security environment reinforce the idea that it has little to fear from Russia.
Ultimately, the reaction to the threats is one of bemusement and a sense of defiance. It reveals a world where many recognize the absurdity of Russia’s attempts to bully and intimidate and are not only unfazed but also possibly strengthened by the prospect of Austria joining NATO. The comments are filled with sarcasm, disbelief, and a shared understanding that Russia’s threats are just another chapter in the same, tired playbook.