By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Two pastors were arrested in St. Petersburg for attempting to block FDOT crews from removing the “Black History Matters” mural. Despite repeated warnings, Andrew Oliver and Benedict Atherton-Zeman sat on the mural in protest of FDOT’s order to remove street art across the state, leading to their arrest on charges of obstructing traffic and obstruction. This action comes after the city of St. Petersburg’s request to preserve several murals, including the “Black History Matters” piece, was denied by FDOT, which cited safety concerns related to state traffic control guidelines and the recently signed Senate Bill 1662. Local officials and community members are strategizing their response to the mural removals, while the governor and FDOT continue to uphold the statewide order.
Read the original article here
Pastors arrested for blocking ‘Black History Matters’ street mural from FDOT crews in St. Pete is a headline that immediately grabs your attention, and for good reason. It’s not every day you see “pastors arrested” and have it be related to a cause that resonates with so many. The comments around this event are a fascinating mix of surprise, admiration, and a deep-seated desire for justice. It’s a case where the actions of two individuals have struck a chord, sparking a wider conversation about civil disobedience, the fight against oppression, and the role of faith in advocating for what’s right.
The fact that these pastors chose to physically obstruct the FDOT machinery attempting to remove the “Black History Matters” mural speaks volumes. They weren’t just voicing their opinions; they were putting their bodies on the line, willing to face arrest for their beliefs. This act of “good trouble” as some have called it, is seen by many as a heroic stand, a clear message that they stand in solidarity with the Black community and against any attempts to erase or diminish their history. The description of the pastors repeatedly ignoring warnings from police to move further emphasizes their dedication.
The comments highlight a welcome break from the negative stereotypes often associated with the term “pastor.” It’s a refreshing change of pace to see religious leaders actively involved in social justice movements. The act of a pastor standing up for what is right is seen by many as doing what the bible truly requires. The Unitarian Universalist Church being the source of the protest makes perfect sense to those who are more familiar with the church’s progressive values and its history of activism. The surprise and appreciation voiced by many underscore how rare and impactful such actions are, especially when juxtaposed against the narratives of certain faith groups often associated with oppression.
The reaction also exposes a deeper sentiment of frustration towards certain political figures. The mention of Florida and the “evil and backward-looking” ideologies of figures like DeSantis reveals a broader struggle against what is perceived as fascism and oppression. The arrest of these pastors isn’t just about a mural; it’s about a wider battle against ideologies that threaten marginalized communities. This context further elevates the pastors’ actions, framing them as resistors against a perceived attack on historical representation and equality.
The comments highlight the importance of civil disobedience and the need for more people to stand up against injustice. It suggests a longing for a society where non-violent protests become a routine part of the landscape, where the oppressed are supported, and oppressors are held accountable. The comments also address the necessity for people to ally, despite their differences to advocate for those who are marginalized.
There’s a strong undercurrent of support for the pastors’ actions, praising them as heroes and recognizing their courage. The comparison to “real Christians” versus “fake ones” further emphasizes the ideological alignment and the clear message that the pastors were making the right stand. It’s an acknowledgment of the power of faith when used to fight against evil and promote compassion. This whole situation clearly illustrates that the fight for justice is not just a battle fought in the courts or through legislation; it is a continuous and ongoing struggle that requires everyone’s participation, even if that means risking personal freedom for the sake of what they believe in.