By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom is utilizing former President Donald Trump’s social media tactics to counter Republican gerrymandering efforts in Texas. Newsom is adopting Trump’s signature all-caps, aggressive tone to warn Texas against redrawing voting districts in favor of Republicans. The governor’s posts threaten legal action from California and other blue states if Texas proceeds, mirroring Trump’s confrontational style. While the strategy has garnered praise from some online users, others criticize it for distracting from more pressing issues and escalating political tensions.
Read the original article here
“We need more of this from Democrats in general”: Gavin Newsom attempts to troll Donald Trump by tweeting in the same style, but not everyone’s a fan of the approach.
Gavin Newsom’s recent attempt to troll Donald Trump by mimicking his signature tweeting style has ignited a fiery debate. The core of the discussion revolves around whether this is a smart move for Democrats, and specifically, whether it’s an effective way to combat Trump’s influence. The resounding sentiment is a resounding ‘yes,’ with many people openly celebrating Newsom’s efforts. The general consensus is that mocking Trump is a great way to handle his thin-skinned nature and expose the absurdity of his communication style. It’s seen as a direct response to the ineffectiveness of “going high when they go low,” a strategy many feel failed to counter the tactics of Trump and his supporters.
The brilliance, according to many, lies in the satirical nature of the approach. By mirroring Trump’s tone and syntax, Newsom highlights how ridiculous it is for a former President to communicate in such a way. It’s a clever move that undercuts the fear that Trump and his administration relied upon. The idea is that the audience understands the intent: a parody of Trump’s communication, designed to undermine his authority and expose the MAGA movement as a joke. Those who see this as a valuable strategy are quick to point out that alternative methods have proven ineffective in the last decade. Political mockery, they argue, has a long and successful history.
However, the response isn’t entirely unified. The phrase “not everyone’s a fan of the approach” echoes throughout the discourse. The individuals who oppose this strategy are the ones who often criticize any use of expletives or perceive it as escalating tensions between the two parties. Some suggest that this approach is undignified, potentially alienating moderate voters. But the vast majority of the comments feel that those who take issue with Newsom’s approach are either part of the problem or are simply not recognizing the severity of the moment. This is seen as a fight, and the old rules don’t apply.
The crux of the argument is this: The old approach of “when they go low, we go high” didn’t work. The MAGA movement thrives on a certain kind of communication that resonates with their supporters. To fight this, Democrats need to adopt a more aggressive strategy, one that plays by their rules. Some believe it’s time to throw everything at the wall to see what sticks. They suggest that rather than treating Trump with respect, which has led to this current situation, he needs to be mocked. Trump thrives on attention, and this method has the potential to undermine his influence and keep him off balance.
Those who disagree often raise the issue of decorum and the potential for escalating political tensions. But proponents of Newsom’s approach are quick to dismiss these concerns. They argue that the current political climate demands a more aggressive response. It’s not just about scoring points, but also about showing the absurdity of the situation and exposing the hypocrisy of the opposition.
Ultimately, the debate over Newsom’s approach reflects the broader discussion about how to combat Trump’s influence and dismantle the MAGA movement. While some believe that traditional methods of political discourse are still effective, others contend that they are no match for the tactics employed by Trump and his supporters. This viewpoint suggests that the only way to counter Trump is to adopt a similarly combative and unconventional strategy. The key is to speak the same language, and to do so with the intention to make a joke of Trump.