By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article highlights a growing threat to American democracy as Republicans, influenced by Trump, are redrawing electoral maps in a manner that undermines the will of the voters. This strategy of gerrymandering, exemplified by actions in Texas and Wisconsin, aims to entrench political control by a minority, potentially leading to policies that harm marginalized communities and suppress voter representation. Facing this challenge, Democrats, such as California Governor Gavin Newsom, are compelled to counter this strategy, even if it means engaging in similar tactics. The long-term solution involves nonpartisan redistricting, but given the current political climate, Democrats must defend democracy through strategic counter-gerrymandering to preserve a republican form of government.
Read the original article here
Newsom is right: Democrats must win the gerrymandering arms race because the reality is stark. The rules of the game have fundamentally shifted. It’s no longer about adhering to some unwritten code of conduct. The other side has recognized that the rules can be changed and they’re playing the game aggressively to win. Democrats, in their commitment to fighting the good fight, have found themselves on the losing end, and the stakes are incredibly high. The very existence of a functioning democracy in the United States could hang in the balance if Democrats don’t aggressively adapt and start playing to win, too.
The urgency of the situation can’t be overstated. Some argue that the time for debate is over and that the time for action is now. The Republicans have shown a willingness to push the boundaries, and Democrats must respond in kind. Ignoring this shift is not an option. The historical precedent is clear: when facing an opponent playing by different rules, you either learn to play their game, or you lose.
The focus should be on maximizing representation. The argument is made that by aggressively pursuing redistricting strategies, Democrats are playing the very game they’ve criticized. However, in this context, it’s a necessary evil. To secure a voice and a future for the country, the focus is on securing as many seats as possible, recognizing the reality of the current political environment.
The strategic implications are significant. Some believe that the aim is to force the Republicans’ hand, potentially leading to court challenges and the need for fundamental electoral reform, such as moving away from the first-past-the-post voting system. Other necessary reforms, such as term limits, are a must in order to break the logjam and get the US functioning again. However, the immediate goal is to ensure a political landscape where Democrats can compete and win.
The concern of some observers is the potential for the situation to get much, much worse. The history is that the Republicans have been escalating their tactics for years, and the time for a response is now. With the opposing party’s determination to secure dominance, the Democrats cannot afford to be passive.
The challenges are not only electoral. The fight goes beyond gerrymandering. It encompasses funding, messaging, and voter outreach. The aim is to counter the misinformation campaigns that are already in motion. Democrats need to invest in local and state elections and fine-tune their messaging to resonate with voters. The focus should be on exposing the truth and fighting against the distortion that is being spread through various platforms.
While the urgency is clear, there’s no ignoring the underlying issues. The state of the economy, education, and the degradation of trust are real factors. The focus should be on addressing these core issues.
The bottom line is this: Democrats must embrace this approach to preserve democracy. While the strategy might seem distasteful, it’s the only way to level the playing field. Failing to compete in the current environment risks losing the fundamental pillars of democracy. The aim is to win by any means necessary.