By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent Cabinet meeting, former President Donald Trump targeted California Governor Gavin Newsom, reigniting claims about the state’s water supply and federal intervention following wildfires. In response, Newsom subtly questioned Trump’s mental state using a screenshot from X’s AI chatbot, Grok, which addressed the repetition of false claims, often associated with memory impairments. This exchange follows a pattern of Trump’s public misstatements and frequent references to a need to have forced the opening of water valves. The White House quickly countered the criticism.
Read the original article here
Gavin Newsom Attacks Trump, 79, With Dementia Post as Feud Goes Feral: Let’s just dive right into this, shall we? It seems the gloves are well and truly off in the political arena, with California Governor Gavin Newsom taking direct aim at former President Donald Trump. The core of this, from what I gather, involves Newsom essentially pointing out the obvious – Trump’s age, and, let’s not mince words, the apparent cognitive decline that many, not just Newsom, have observed. The phrase “feud goes feral” really nails it; it’s become a no-holds-barred brawl, and the language used is, to put it mildly, aggressive.
This isn’t just some subtle jab; it’s a full-on assault, reminiscent of playground taunts and the kind of tactics that Trump himself has mastered over the years. Newsom is essentially saying, “Hey, this guy is old, and potentially not firing on all cylinders.” And the reaction? Well, as you might expect, it’s been explosive. It seems the main complaint from those who support Trump is that it’s “an attack.” However, for some, the truth itself is an attack when it’s not what they want to hear. This is the era where merely quoting Trump’s gaffes, missteps, and verbal blunders is considered an act of war.
What’s fascinating is the underlying strategy here. There’s a sense that Newsom is trying to fight fire with fire, using Trump’s own weaponized style of communication against him. The goal is to “reduce him to soundbites,” mirroring Trump’s approach to opponents. It’s a schoolyard strategy, yeah, but some believe it might be the only way to get through to the man and his supporters. The irony, of course, is that the Trump campaign and his supporters will perceive it as an attack since they often do.
The article’s details that are not available without a paywall. The core of it is the observation of Trump’s age and potential cognitive issues. It is the equivalent of saying, “The Emperor has no clothes.” It seems clear that this is also a political move to force the narrative.
Interestingly, the tone shifts. While many might disagree with Newsom’s politics or his handling of California, some people find themselves strangely in agreement with his tactics. It’s a case of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” It’s about changing the discussion and making it so that journalists have to report on these issues. It’s a masterclass in getting under Trump’s skin, using his own tactics against him, and, importantly, forcing the media to address what many feel is a critical aspect of Trump’s current fitness for office.
This entire thing has clearly struck a nerve. Some are pointing out the irony of those criticizing Newsom for criticizing Trump, while simultaneously defending Trump from any criticism. There’s a clear divide. Trump’s supporters will see this as a sign of Newsom’s desperation or hypocrisy.
The other angle here is the media. The article touches upon the failures of the media in presenting the truth and the fact that Trump’s supporters are likely to see any criticism as an attack. Many believe the media has failed in its duty. It’s a point of contention, with some arguing that media outlets are either biased towards Trump or too afraid to call out his behavior and fitness for office.
The response to Newsom’s comments will inevitably follow party lines. It’s a war of words. The end result will be more mudslinging. The bigger question is whether these verbal jabs will have any real impact on the upcoming election. The comments just highlight that these are the times we live in.