HuffPost has been dedicated to delivering factual journalism for twenty years. The publication is requesting support to continue its mission of providing essential, fact-based news coverage. Reader support has been crucial in the past, bolstering the newsroom and strengthening the publication through challenging periods. They are now seeking further assistance to ensure their longevity and continued ability to serve readers.
Read the original article here
Gavin Newsom Reveals What World Leaders Really Say About Trump Behind His Back
Gavin Newsom recently shared some insights that have sparked quite a reaction: he claims world leaders are laughing behind Donald Trump’s back. He revealed this at a Politico event, stating that he’s heard these sentiments firsthand after numerous encounters with foreign leaders. The core of Newsom’s assertion is that Trump is being “played everywhere” and is an “embarrassment” on the global stage. This isn’t just casual observation; he’s basing his claims on dozens upon dozens of meetings and interactions. It’s a strong statement, and it’s certainly one that has resonated with a lot of people, given the existing perception of Trump’s international relations.
The reaction to Newsom’s comments seems to be a mixture of validation and, perhaps, a little bit of resignation. Several comments highlighted the belief that Trump’s presidency was often viewed with derision on a global scale, the world seemingly agreeing with Newsom’s assessment. It’s worth noting the incident where Russia targeted a U.S. factory in Ukraine after a meeting between Putin and Trump. The attack, coming as it did shortly after the meeting, seemed to underscore the point Newsom made.
Many pointed out how foreign leaders might feign respect or even friendship when dealing with Trump, only to then express their true feelings privately. This creates a situation where Trump might return home believing he’s been successful in his dealings, while the reality is often far different. One common point mentioned is how world leaders might have laughed at Trump’s expense, and that it goes hand-in-hand with the way that Trump operated. One can infer that Trump’s often unusual behavior on the world stage simply provided fodder for humor behind closed doors.
The discussion quickly delves into the potential implications of such perceptions. If world leaders are laughing, it could be seen as damaging to America’s standing and influence. Another key argument is that, regardless of what world leaders claim, the underlying implications of these events affect the people. This also affects America’s reputation. This is far from simply being something to laugh about.
The debate also raises questions about Newsom’s motivations and potential political strategies. Some saw his statements as a way to critique Trump’s foreign policy. Some believe Newsom could gain support through this. Another recurring point that gets brought up is that the perception of Trump is shared by a large number of non-Americans, who may experience a mix of amusement and concern about the United States.
Moreover, the conversation explores the tactics that might be at play. Some users brought up the “48 Laws of Power” to illuminate Trump’s actions. The ability to manipulate by using a mirror effect could be used to disarm others and be a way to gain the upper hand. This can apply to Trump and his dealings with those from other countries.
Finally, the discussion reflects on the current state of American politics and the way the media covers such stories. Some lamented what they see as a lack of comprehensive media coverage, highlighting the perceived failures of major news outlets to thoroughly examine these issues. The conversation emphasizes how the narrative is shaped and who dictates it. All of this points to a feeling that what Newsom revealed is something many already knew, but it’s being brought up again because it is important.
