California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed concern that Donald Trump intends to remain in power, suggesting he doesn’t believe in fair elections. Newsom cited Trump’s actions, such as building a large ballroom, and an alleged private conversation about a third term as evidence for his claim. Furthermore, a recent poll revealed that a majority of Republicans support Trump running for a third term, despite its unconstitutionality. While Trump has made conflicting statements about his future, the governor’s remarks indicate that the possibility of him running for a third term is something to be taken seriously.
Read the original article here
Gavin Newsom’s warning that Donald Trump aims for a third term has certainly struck a chord, and it’s easy to see why. It’s a bold claim, especially considering the constitutional limits on presidential terms. The central idea here isn’t simply that Trump wants to *run* again. It’s that he wants to remain in power, potentially circumventing the democratic process altogether. The key point is that he wants to avoid another election. It’s a shift from “running” to “ruling.”
The context behind this claim is worth exploring. The arguments against his re-election, on a third term, are not about constitutional law and whether he is eligible to run. The arguments stem from fears he will find a way around the election itself. We are meant to be awake, and aware that the way he might do this is by cancelling an election. This aligns with observations that Trump is already actively undermining faith in the electoral system. He does this by spreading misinformation that the elections are rigged, thus creating a pretense for rejecting their legitimacy. The end game here is to maintain power, regardless of the will of the people.
Now, the response is a mixture of concern and, frankly, a call to action. It’s not just about pointing out the potential danger; it’s about urging people to acknowledge the gravity of the situation. The idea is that the time for complacency is over. It’s time to recognize what’s happening and prepare accordingly. The sentiment seems to be that traditional political tactics are insufficient.
There’s also a strong sense that Trump doesn’t want to *run* for a third term in the conventional sense. He wants to engineer a scenario where he simply *remains* in office, potentially by declaring the election results illegitimate. The call to “wake up” isn’t a subtle suggestion. The message is about recognizing the potential for a far more authoritarian outcome than many are willing to acknowledge.
The potential tactics that are being laid out are not about running for an election. They are about undermining, manipulating, or eliminating the process altogether. The goal isn’t about winning a vote; it’s about bypassing it.
This perspective also raises questions about the role of Republicans. The idea here is that a Trump win will ensure a new election never comes. The notion is that Trump is not just acting alone; he has a network of supporters who are willing to enable his actions, even if those actions are in violation of the democratic process. This is not about just having an election. This is about having an election that Trump has already won. The party is meant to do anything that needs to be done.
There’s also the recognition that Trump is not in the best of health. If the argument is that Trump might not even make it to the next election, one of the outcomes to avoid is the installation of someone else to maintain the vision that Trump has created. This is about more than just one person; it’s about the broader political movement and its potential long-term impact. The claim is about making it as hard to vote, if at all.
The overall tone is one of urgency and alarm. The suggestion is not just that Trump is a threat, but that the American people are in danger of losing their right to choose their leaders. It’s a stark assessment of the political landscape. It’s a perspective that sees the potential for a fundamental shift in the nature of American democracy. The call to “wake up” is not just about being aware of the threat; it’s about preparing for a very different future.
