By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom is employing a combative and meme-heavy social media strategy, modeled after Donald Trump’s online persona, to counter Republican initiatives. This involves all-caps threats, pop culture parodies, and AI-edited content. Newsom’s strategy includes mocking Trump on social media while also responding to redistricting plans in Texas. The governor’s team is adopting tactics like trolling and parody to shift the narrative in Democrats’ favor, which is resonating with Democratic voters. However, some strategists warn that this viral appeal may not translate into broader support.
Read the original article here
Gavin Newsom breaks through by trolling Trump at his own meme game, and it seems to be working, at least on some level. The comments suggest that Newsom has successfully grabbed attention by adopting Trump’s tactics, specifically through the use of memes and the kind of aggressive, headline-grabbing rhetoric that Trump pioneered. The general consensus seems to be a mix of amusement and a grudging respect for his willingness to engage in this particular brand of political warfare.
The effectiveness of Newsom’s strategy is debated, with some arguing that it’s a necessary evil in a political landscape dominated by social media and sound bites. It’s a recognition that traditional, policy-focused messaging may not cut through the noise. The comments highlight that some see Newsom as the only Democrat currently willing to directly confront Trump and his methods. However, others express concern that this focus on the “meme game” distracts from substantive policy issues. They argue that real progress lies in addressing marginalized communities, wealth redistribution, and genuinely improving the country.
Several people acknowledge the irony of celebrating a politician employing tactics often associated with Trump. The comments show that some find it depressing that political discourse has devolved to this point, where memes and trolling are considered effective strategies. There’s a clear understanding that the American political landscape has changed, with a greater emphasis on showmanship and less on traditional policy debates. The comments also reveal a certain level of cynicism, a sense that the public is being manipulated and distracted from more important issues.
The comments suggest that Newsom’s approach may be resonating with centrist voters. Some conservatives admit to being intrigued by Newsom’s recent moves, especially given his conservative stances on certain issues. This is a departure from the usual, and reflects a willingness to look at the bigger picture of a candidate’s potential to defeat Trump. On the other hand, this is seen as a purely strategic move by some who express disdain for his policies and record. They are quick to note that the focus on tactics is a distraction from the actual issues at hand.
Some commenters raise valid points about Newsom’s record, mentioning issues such as the homeless crisis in California, the alleged handling of COVID-19 restrictions, and his overall approach to governance. They express skepticism about his motivations, accusing him of being a power-hungry politician who prioritizes image over substance. The concerns stem from those who believe that Newsom’s actions are designed to appeal to a specific voter base.
Another aspect of the discussion is about the broader political landscape and the role of the media. The comments suggest that the media is more likely to pay attention to someone who fights fire with fire, and that Newsom has successfully captured the media’s attention by mimicking Trump’s approach. While some see this as a positive, others are concerned that it reinforces the idea that politics is a reality TV show, rather than a platform for addressing serious issues. The comments point out that this distracts from substantive policies that will uplift marginalized communities, redistribute wealth, and actually work to make the country better.
Finally, the comments indicate that Newsom’s actions are likely to be interpreted in multiple ways. Some view him as a strategic mastermind, willing to do whatever it takes to defeat Trump. Others see him as an opportunist, willing to sacrifice principles for political gain. The truth probably lies somewhere in between, but one thing is clear: Newsom has successfully inserted himself into the political conversation, and he’s doing it by playing the game on Trump’s terms. The hope and fear of those commenting is that something real comes from this action.