By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the state would redraw its electoral maps after former President Donald Trump missed a deadline in an ongoing redistricting dispute between Democratic and Republican states. Newsom’s office mimicked Trump’s social media style to mock him, and Newsom expressed his desire to counteract what he views as map rigging in red states. Newsom plans to ask voters to override existing congressional maps and create more Democratic-leaning seats, although the White House is seeking to enlist other red states in the redistricting clash. Trump defended the Texas plan, citing his popular vote win, but this is not how congressional seats are awarded.
Read the original article here
Newsom says California will draw new electoral maps after Trump ‘missed’ deadline, and the initial reaction is a mix of excitement, vindication, and a healthy dose of schadenfreude. There’s a palpable sense that, finally, the gloves are off. The sentiment is clear: it’s about time someone played the game the way the other side has been playing it for years. The playful use of Trump’s signature caps-lock style in the announcement is particularly well-received, with many finding it hilarious and a clever way to poke fun at the former president. This isn’t just about policy; it’s about the art of the takedown.
Newsom’s move seems to be resonating with a frustration many have felt for a long time, the feeling that Democrats have been too hesitant to fight fire with fire. The idea of redrawing the maps, a practice often employed by Republicans to gain an electoral edge, is seen as a necessary response to years of strategic maneuvering. The discussion immediately goes into a deeper level of analysis, considering the strategic implications. The prospect of potential legal challenges and the need for coordinated action from other states is mentioned, emphasizing the importance of a unified front. The immediate thought that this is a direct counter to actions in Texas and what the impact of that will be.
The concern about the potential for legal battles in the Supreme Court is acknowledged, recognizing the complex legal landscape of redistricting. There’s a clear awareness that the move could be challenged, but there’s a collective hope that Newsom’s approach is legally sound and that other blue states will follow suit, creating a domino effect that could significantly shift the balance of power. The possibility of a few seats gained is not what is being considered. It’s the wider effect. The notion that this is a response to decades of being on the losing side, the idea that the Democrats need to get scrappy is well received.
The conversation transitions into a broader critique of the political landscape. The sentiment is that the Democrats need to adapt and embrace a more aggressive strategy. This includes calling out the opposition on their actions and the ways they are attempting to win elections. It also includes a call for more leaders who are willing to exploit media coverage, rather than shying away from it. The general feeling is that Democrats have been too polite, and it’s time for a more strategic approach.
The idea of playing the game dirty, of fighting fire with fire, is being met with cheers, and the desire to see the opposition “cry” is very strong. The general idea is a new approach is needed, one that is willing to make them, to do whatever is necessary to level the playing field and protect against what is being viewed as a fascist approach to policy. There is the understanding that what is currently being done, simply is not working, and change is needed.
There is a concern about the potential for things to backfire, with the recognition that this tactic requires careful planning and execution. There’s an understanding that there could be downsides, the need for legal experts, and the risk of unintended consequences. Despite the potential pitfalls, the overall sentiment remains optimistic, driven by a desire to see decisive action and a belief that the ends justify the means in this political climate.
The discussion takes a slight detour, with speculation about the political motivations behind Newsom’s actions. The idea that this move could be a strategic play to appeal to the progressive wing of the Democratic party, potentially positioning Newsom for a future run, is floated. This is not viewed as a negative. A general acknowledgement that Newsom is trying to build a broader coalition, one that extends beyond the established party base, which again is seen as strategic. The acknowledgement of the two-party system adds to the need to play dirty.
The overall tone remains upbeat and supportive. The sentiment is one of long-awaited action and the hope that other blue states will follow. The excitement that is generated when the announcement is made of the redrawing of the maps is well received, with expressions of pride for the Governor and the State, and the belief that this is a crucial step in a much larger fight. The conversation shows the intensity of the feelings. The excitement is high, and the sense is the gloves are off and it is time to fight.