By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Governor Newsom’s office swiftly condemned the use of U.S. soldiers rolling out a red carpet for Vladimir Putin, describing the situation as “disgusting.” The image, which the Governor shared, depicted soldiers kneeling and preparing the carpet. This action drew sharp criticism from Newsom’s administration, highlighting the perceived disrespect and symbolic implications of such a gesture. The press office did not elaborate further on their response.
Read the original article here
Newsom’s Press Office Slams ‘DISGUSTING’ Use Of U.S. Soldiers To Roll Out Red Carpet For Putin. The core sentiment here is one of utter disbelief and disgust at the sight of American soldiers kneeling to facilitate a red carpet for Vladimir Putin. It’s a visual that has clearly struck a nerve, and the reaction isn’t just about the optics; it’s a deep-seated feeling of something having fundamentally changed, and not for the better, in the country. This is more than just a symbolic gesture; it feels like a surrender of American values, a stark contrast to the sacrifices made by soldiers throughout history.
The visceral reaction is palpable. The comparison to Iwo Jima highlights the perceived fall from grace. The mention of Fox News’ selective outrage, where criticism of Obama’s interactions with Putin was replaced with silence, underscores the perception of hypocrisy and bias. It’s not just the red carpet; it’s the perceived double standard that’s truly infuriating. The contrast is stark: Obama’s perceived deference versus Trump’s literal show of subservience.
The focus quickly shifts to the political implications, and the acknowledgment that Newsom is capitalizing on this. The call for a debate, a challenge to Trump, is more than just political posturing; it’s a demand for accountability. The sentiment is clear: this isn’t just about policy; it’s about character. The reaction is clearly one of support for Newsom’s assertive stance, a welcome change from what is perceived as a lack of opposition. The recognition that this is an effective communication strategy, that it’s getting the press’s attention, demonstrates an understanding of how to navigate the current political landscape.
The use of U.S. soldiers for this purpose is repeatedly described as “disgusting”. The language used, along with the many comments about this being unconstitutional, suggests a profound sense of betrayal. The feeling is that the military, which should be above politics, is being used as a prop in a dangerous game. The question of what constitutes standard operating procedure for welcoming foreign dignitaries is brought up.
The discussion goes on to include the lack of coverage regarding the alleged Russian bounties on U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. This comparison emphasizes the perceived betrayal of American soldiers and the double standards that seem to be applied based on political affiliation. The assertion is that Trump is essentially a Russian asset, contributing to the perception that American interests are being sacrificed. It also asks, hypothetically, if Zelensky would get the same treatment if he were visiting the United States. This is a key question and adds complexity to the discussion.
The comments delve into the reactions of active military personnel and veterans. The initial reaction expressed that this would create a situation of shame and discomfort. The perception is that there’s a complete lack of respect. There’s a strong sense of disillusionment with the military. The criticism that the GOP represents the ‘fakest Patriots around’, points to a broader distrust of institutions.
The reactions extend beyond the soldiers themselves, including an outright dismissal of the troops. The strong language, including insults, highlights the depth of feeling regarding the situation. The discussion of constitutional violations highlights the gravity of the situation.
There’s a recognition that the situation is ripe for exploitation, and the suggestion that Newsom is taking advantage of an easy path to the White House. The discussion is less about policy and more about the erosion of ethics and the consequences of the decisions that have been made. It’s the feeling that the country has been compromised and that the norms have been upended.