By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request concerning the Trump administration’s deployment of federal agents near a recent event in Los Angeles. Newsom’s office believes the administration is attempting to intimidate those defending the electoral process, particularly after the presence of ICE officers was noted. The FOIA also seeks information on communications with Fox News regarding the embedding of a reporter with the ICE agents. Newsom has described Trump’s actions as a dangerous step toward authoritarianism, citing the tactics of despots in Russia and North Korea.
Read the original article here
Newsom Files Request for Info on Trump Admin Use of Military
So, it seems like California’s Governor Gavin Newsom is stepping into the ring, and he’s not pulling any punches. He’s filed a formal request for information regarding the Trump administration’s use of federal law enforcement and the military. The core of his concern, according to his public statement, is that this action was designed to “intimidate” those involved in ensuring a fair electoral process. He’s explicitly stated that he sees this as a dangerous step toward authoritarianism, echoing concerns about tactics employed by leaders in Russia and North Korea, who he suggests Trump admires. It’s a bold move, and it’s definitely grabbing everyone’s attention.
The general sentiment seems to be that Newsom is doing something that needs to be done. There’s a clear sense that the use of military force in this context is unconstitutional and potentially a display of classic fascism. People are rallying behind the idea of holding the previous administration accountable and demanding transparency. The phrase “release the files” comes up frequently, implying a desire to uncover the full extent of the Trump administration’s actions. There’s definitely a feeling that this is a critical moment, and Newsom is one of the few leaders willing to confront it head-on.
This also brings up the question of leadership in the Democratic party. Some people are calling out the lack of action from other prominent Democrats, pointing out that Newsom seems to be the only one who’s truly fighting back. The criticism of “sternly worded letters” and inaction is pretty pointed, highlighting the frustration some voters feel. The fact that Newsom is taking a strong stance is seen by some as a positive contrast to the perceived passivity of other party leaders.
Of course, this isn’t without its own internal political commentary. Some people are cynical, questioning Newsom’s motives, with some insinuating he’s simply using the situation to boost his own profile. There’s talk of careerism and ambition, the suggestion that Newsom is merely positioning himself for a future run for office. There are also those who don’t particularly like Newsom but recognize his actions as a necessary response in the current political climate. The overall impression is that most believe something needed to be done.
There are discussions of the Epstein files and other potential scandals. It looks like Newsom is perceived as a strong voice in a situation that demands strong action. The fact that Newsom has seemingly chosen to act where others haven’t is what seems to be resonating with a lot of people, regardless of their personal feelings toward the Governor.
It’s also worth pointing out the discussions surrounding the higher standards often expected of Democrats. While it may be perceived by some as unfair, there’s a sentiment that the public has a higher expectation for Democrats, and the party is more often criticized for inaction or perceived failings. The overall reaction seems to be of support for Newsom’s actions.